Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 05/10/2010 07:31 AM, Venkatraman S wrote:
>>
>> Nishanth Menon wrote:
>
> Please see [1] for SOC specific feature handling. any reasons we can't
> handle it by adding a new feature?
>
> [1]
>
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torv
On 05/10/2010 07:31 AM, Venkatraman S wrote:
Nishanth Menon wrote:
Please see [1] for SOC specific feature handling. any reasons we can't
handle it by adding a new feature?
[1]
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;f=arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h#l4
Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 05/09/2010 05:51 AM, Venkatraman S wrote:
>>
>> Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>>
>>> Chikkature Rajashekar, Madhusudhan had written, on 05/07/2010 11:59 AM,
>>> the
>>> following:
>>>>
>>&g
; 'kishore kadiyala'
Cc: S, Venkatraman; linux-o...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
m...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
ker...@lists.arm.linux.org.uk; 'Adrian Hunter'; Kadiyala, Kishore; 'Tony
Lindgren'
Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 2/2] omap hsmmc: adaptation of sdma de
M
>>>> To: Shilimkar, Santosh; 'kishore kadiyala'
>>>> Cc: S, Venkatraman; linux-o...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
>>>
>>> m...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
>>>>
>>>> ker...@lists.arm.linux.org.uk; 'Adrian Hunter'; Kadiyal
>
> >>> omap_mmc_platform_data is MMC specific platform data. Why add a SDMA
> >>> specific feature capability into it? Even though you add it there, you
> >> will
> >>> still need to have a cpu check before that can be set in a common
> code.
> >>>
> >> CPU checks are allowed to be in the p
linux-
m...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
ker...@lists.arm.linux.org.uk; 'Adrian Hunter'; Kadiyala, Kishore; 'Tony
Lindgren'
Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 2/2] omap hsmmc: adaptation of sdma descriptor
autoloading feature
-Original Message-
From: Shilimkar, Santosh [m
rnel.org;
> linux-arm-ker...@lists.arm.linux.org.uk; 'Adrian Hunter'; Kadiyala,
> Kishore; 'Tony Lindgren'
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 2/2] omap hsmmc: adaptation of sdma descriptor
> autoloading feature
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chikkature Rajashekar
rm.linux.org.uk; 'Adrian Hunter'; Kadiyala, Kishore; 'Tony
> Lindgren'
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 2/2] omap hsmmc: adaptation of sdma descriptor
> autoloading feature
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Shilimkar, Santosh [mailto:santosh.sh
kkature Rajashekar,
> Madhusudhan; Adrian Hunter; Kadiyala, Kishore; Tony Lindgren
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 2/2] omap hsmmc: adaptation of sdma descriptor
> autoloading feature
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: kishore kadiyala [mailto:kishorek.kadiy...@gmail.com
ux.org.uk; Chikkature Rajashekar, Madhusudhan; Adrian
> Hunter; Kadiyala, Kishore;
> Tony Lindgren
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] omap hsmmc: adaptation of sdma descriptor
> autoloading feature
>
> <>
>
> >> I am not clear about the method. The board files export the
dhan; Adrian
> Hunter; Kadiyala, Kishore; Tony Lindgren; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] omap hsmmc: adaptation of sdma descriptor
> autoloading feature
>
> Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: svenk
<>
>> I am not clear about the method. The board files export the
>> omap_mmc_platform_data.
>> Does it imply that all board files have to change and export
>> the capability so that it can be queried ?
> No. You don't have to modify the board files. This would need
> change in devices.c which com
c@vger.kernel.org;
>> linux-arm-ker...@lists.arm.linux.org.uk;
>> Chikkature Rajashekar, Madhusudhan; Adrian Hunter; Kadiyala, Kishore; Tony
>> Lindgren
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] omap hsmmc: adaptation of sdma descriptor
>> autoloading feature
>>
>> [Long
.org.uk;
> Chikkature Rajashekar, Madhusudhan; Adrian Hunter; Kadiyala, Kishore; Tony
> Lindgren
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] omap hsmmc: adaptation of sdma descriptor
> autoloading feature
>
> [Long sections have been trimmed to the context of discussion]
> Shilimkar, Sant
Hunter'; Kadiyala, Kishore; 'Tony Lindgren'
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 2/2] omap hsmmc: adaptation of sdma descriptor
> autoloading feature
>
>
>
> > >> + if (cpu_is_omap44xx() || cpu_is_omap3630()) {
> > > Can we avoid above by passing this pa
> >> + if (cpu_is_omap44xx() || cpu_is_omap3630()) {
> > Can we avoid above by passing this part of platform data??
> > devices.c
>
> I am not clear about the method. The board files export the
> omap_mmc_platform_data.
> Does it imply that all board files have to change and export
> the cap
[Long sections have been trimmed to the context of discussion]
Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: svenk...@gmail.com [mailto:svenk...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
>> Venkatraman S
>> Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 11:05 PM
>> To: linux-o...@vger.kernel.org; linux-mmc@vg
> -Original Message-
> From: svenk...@gmail.com [mailto:svenk...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Venkatraman
> S
> Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 11:05 PM
> To: linux-o...@vger.kernel.org; linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-arm-ker...@lists.arm.linux.org.uk
> Cc: Chikkature Rajashekar, Madhusudh
19 matches
Mail list logo