On Wednesday, December 19, 2012, Konstantin Dorfman wrote:
On 12/17/2012 02:26 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
Hi, Konstantin.
I added comments more below.
I've answered below.
On Wednesday, December 12, 2012, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
On Monday, December 10, 2012, Konstantin Dorfman wrote:
On 12/17/2012 02:26 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
Hi, Konstantin.
I added comments more below.
I've answered below.
On Wednesday, December 12, 2012, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
On Monday, December 10, 2012, Konstantin Dorfman wrote:
When current request is running on the bus and if next request
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 18 2012, Konstantin Dorfman wrote:
@@ -1374,6 +1367,8 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq,
struct request *rqc)
mmc_queue_bounce_post(mq_rq);
switch (status) {
+ case MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST:
+ BUG(); /* should
Hi, Konstantin.
I added comments more below.
On Wednesday, December 12, 2012, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
On Monday, December 10, 2012, Konstantin Dorfman wrote:
When current request is running on the bus and if next request fetched
by mmcqd is NULL, mmc context (mmcqd thread) gets blocked until
On Monday, December 10, 2012, Konstantin Dorfman wrote:
When current request is running on the bus and if next request fetched
by mmcqd is NULL, mmc context (mmcqd thread) gets blocked until the
current request completes. This means if new request comes in while
the mmcqd thread is blocked,
