John Rigby writes:
> Just to be clear, my post was in response to the reported problems
> with enabling sdio irqs with this patch:
> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/69122/
>
> The patch originator reported good results but others reported
> complete failure. My hack fixed the problem for me.
n
> Cc: Mike Rapoport; Dirk Behme; Phaneendra Kumar Alapati; linux-
> o...@vger.kernel.org; linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; Adrian Hunter; Paasikivi
> Teemu.3 (EXT-Ixonos/Tampere)
> Subject: Re: sdio irq hack for omap_hsmmc.c (was: Re: [PATCH]
> OMAP35xx:SDIO IRQ Support for OMAP35xx)
>
&
Just to be clear, my post was in response to the reported problems
with enabling sdio irqs with this patch:
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/69122/
The patch originator reported good results but others reported
complete failure. My hack fixed the problem for me. I believe this
much more modest
It is hard to comment on what is happening here without a patch. Is it a
performance issue or that SDIO functionality failure with PM enabled?
The MMC controller supports wakeup capability on the dat1 line using a GPIO
for a SDIO interrupt. I guess that should help.
Regards,
Madhu
> -Origina
