On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:01:53AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 05/23/2014 03:23 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> ...
> > Speaking of which my preferred solution is another one. As a bootloader
> > developer it really annoys me that I don't have the possibility to tell
> > the kernel to boot a partic
On 05/23/2014 02:29 AM, Michael Olbrich wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 01:23:27PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 05/22/2014 12:21 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:16:35AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 05/22/2014 09:30 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>>
On 05/23/2014 03:23 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
...
> Speaking of which my preferred solution is another one. As a bootloader
> developer it really annoys me that I don't have the possibility to tell
> the kernel to boot a particular device. What I really want to do is to
> pass a devicetree phandle to
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 01:23:27PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> Does it solve the following, which AFAIK has always been the primary
> >> argument against aligning block device IDs with controller IDs:
> >>
> >> - User inserts SD card into MMC controller ID (or alias) 1.
> >> - /dev/mmcblk1 no
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 01:23:27PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 05/22/2014 12:21 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:16:35AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> On 05/22/2014 09:30 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> The wish to have persistent MMC block device n
On 05/22/2014 12:21 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:16:35AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 05/22/2014 09:30 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> The wish to have persistent MMC block device names for passing a suitable
>>> root=/dev/mmcblkX option came up several tim
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:16:35AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 05/22/2014 09:30 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The wish to have persistent MMC block device names for passing a suitable
> > root=/dev/mmcblkX option came up several times already and has been
> > discussed
> > at
On 05/22/2014 09:30 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The wish to have persistent MMC block device names for passing a suitable
> root=/dev/mmcblkX option came up several times already and has been discussed
> at least in these threads:
>
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kerne
Hi all,
The wish to have persistent MMC block device names for passing a suitable
root=/dev/mmcblkX option came up several times already and has been discussed
at least in these threads:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-July/109984.html
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux
