Hi,
I got the same problem.
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
index 782c0ee..a0991ad 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -1849,7 +1849,7 @@ int sdhci_add_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ;
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 06:57:35AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 05:53:46AM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just bisected and reverted this commit.
>
> Commit-ID would have been useful, too:
> b08caed8659ab27199db51c63a35c5ee067fc7ef
> Also, adding the auth
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 05:53:46AM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just bisected and reverted this commit.
Commit-ID would have been useful, too: b08caed8659ab27199db51c63a35c5ee067fc7ef
Also, adding the author to cc, done now.
> With it I am unable to read MMC cards via Ricoh MMC func
On 11/2/2010 12:32 PM, Philip Rakity wrote:
>
> I believe the patch
>
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mmc/3966
>
> does what you want -- if not can you let me know what is missing
Hi Philip,
I've missed this patch, sorry.
Peppe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
>
>
> I believe the patch
>
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mmc/3966
>
> does what you want -- if not can you let me know what is missing
>
>
>
> On Nov 2, 2010, at 4:25 AM, Peppe CAVALLARO wrote:
>
>> On 11/1/2010 2:52 AM, Philip Rakity wrote:
>>>
>>> On Oct 31, 2010
On 11/1/2010 2:52 AM, Philip Rakity wrote:
>
> On Oct 31, 2010, at 6:44 PM, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 16:01 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 05:47 -0700, Philip Rakity wrote:
> >>> eMMC unlike SD does not have a field to inside the card data to
> say t
On Oct 31, 2010, at 6:44 PM, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 16:01 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
>> On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 05:47 -0700, Philip Rakity wrote:
>>> eMMC unlike SD does not have a field to inside the card data to say the bit
>>> width of the card.
>>> In addition some m
On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 16:01 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 05:47 -0700, Philip Rakity wrote:
> > eMMC unlike SD does not have a field to inside the card data to say the bit
> > width of the card.
> > In addition some mmc cards (from Transcend) only support 1 bit mode. The
On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 05:47 -0700, Philip Rakity wrote:
> eMMC unlike SD does not have a field to inside the card data to say the bit
> width of the card.
> In addition some mmc cards (from Transcend) only support 1 bit mode. The
> physical pins to support 4 bit data are not there as well as n
eMMC unlike SD does not have a field to inside the card data to say the bit
width of the card.
In addition some mmc cards (from Transcend) only support 1 bit mode. The
physical pins to support 4 bit data are not there as well as no card specific
data saying the bus width of the card.
The on
Hi,
I just bisected and reverted this commit.
With it I am unable to read MMC cards via Ricoh MMC function,
support for which I added recently.
07:00.2 System peripheral: Ricoh Co Ltd R5C843 MMC Host Controller (rev
12)
The logs show lot of errors like this:
[ 219.590748] mmc1: new MMC card a
11 matches
Mail list logo
