Hi,
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 17:56, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
David, are you very confident in the bisection being correct?
I've built packages for Archlinux with the suspected commit dropped.
So far there are three confirmations in the forum. Also there are new
symptoms described.
...@opensource.se; Andrei Warkentin
Subject: Re: kernel 2.6.38.6 MMC controller problem (fwd)
2011/5/16 Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de:
On Mon, 16 May 2011, Chris Ball wrote:
My intuition is that we should revert it now -- it's been a week since
the final -rc, so you'd expect .39
It's actually an oops. The backtrace is attached.
David
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 09:06, Guennadi Liakhovetski
g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote:
(added the ML and previous discussion participants to CC)
Looks like my patch was indeed less obviious, than we thought. We need a
lock-up backtrace, I
divide error???... hmmm, maybe one of SDHCI maintainers has to look at
it?:)
Thanks
Guennadi
On Mon, 16 May 2011, David Strobach wrote:
It's actually an oops. The backtrace is attached.
David
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 09:06, Guennadi Liakhovetski
g.liakhovet...@gmx.dewrote:
(added
Hi..
i found the similar case. So i wonder how i can resolve that..
But i didn't find the solution and i didn't know what problem..
i want to know that solution..
-first card inserted (correct card detect)
# mmc1: new SDHC card at address e624
mmcblk1: mmc1:e624 SU04G 3.69 GiB
mmcblk1: p1
#
#
On Mon, 16 May 2011, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
Hi..
i found the similar case. So i wonder how i can resolve that..
But i didn't find the solution and i didn't know what problem..
What MMC host driver? Anything in dmesg?
Thanks
Guennadi
i want to know that solution..
-first card inserted
Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2011, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
Hi..
i found the similar case. So i wonder how i can resolve that..
But i didn't find the solution and i didn't know what problem..
What MMC host driver? Anything in dmesg?
Using sdhci and dw_mmc controller..i will
Hi,
On Mon, May 16 2011, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
divide error???... hmmm, maybe one of SDHCI maintainers has to look at
it?:)
Just tried to reproduce this, and can't. David, could you share your
.config please?
I can't see any obvious candidates for a divide error. Guennadi, do you
Hi,
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 16:52, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Just tried to reproduce this, and can't. David, could you share your
.config please?
I use the stock archlinux kernel, so the .config is here:
Hi,
On Mon, May 16 2011, David Strobach wrote:
I don't always end up with the divide error either. See the log in the
OP. We can also ask for logs on the archlinux forum thread, I
referenced in the OP.
Oh, that's interesting -- https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23778 was
opened on April 15th
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 17:56, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Oh, that's interesting -- https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23778 was
opened on April 15th with the divide error crash, but I didn't send
Guennadi's patch to Linus until May 9th. So this patch can't be the
whole story.
I don't
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 17:56, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Also, perhaps you could confirm that setting CONFIG_MMC_CLKGATE=n
makes all of the problems go away, even with the bad patch applied?
Confirmed. No problem with CONFIG_MMC_CLKGATE=n
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
2011/5/16 Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de:
On Mon, 16 May 2011, Chris Ball wrote:
My intuition is that we should revert it now -- it's been a week since
the final -rc, so you'd expect .39 to be released today, and we can
always add your patch back into stable via .40-rc1 if it's
13 matches
Mail list logo
