Re: next problem - httpd doesn't start

2001-07-02 Thread Jim Reimer
Brian Bilbrey wrote: > as root, type chkconfig --list | grep httpd > > I get this > > [root@mail bilbrey]# chkconfig --list | grep httpd > httpd 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off > > If you get all OFF, as I suspect you will, yep > > then chkconfig --add httpd > > and repe

Re: next problem - httpd doesn't start

2001-07-02 Thread Brian Bilbrey
as root, type chkconfig --list | grep httpd I get this [root@mail bilbrey]# chkconfig --list | grep httpd httpd 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off If you get all OFF, as I suspect you will, then chkconfig --add httpd and repeat the listing command - should be alright from there

next problem - httpd doesn't start

2001-07-02 Thread Jim Reimer
Ok - this probably deserves an rtfm answer, just tell me which fm to r. httpd does not start when the system boots. I can start it manually with no problem. The only decent book I have for is for RH6.0, and it says there's a 'linuxconf' utility for things like this, but it doesn't seem to exist

[solved] Re: Can't telnet/ftp to/from Linux box on LAN

2001-07-02 Thread Jim Reimer
Yep, the firewall was set up to refuse connections on ports below 1023, and xinetd has a configuration file for each protocol, all of which default to 'disabled'. Thanks, everybody. -jdr- Ray Olszewski wrote: > OK, Jim. Your answers rule out a lot of possibilities. > > First thing is to look

es1370 and es1371.

2001-07-02 Thread Jose Luis Alarcon Sanchez
Hi friends about Linux ! I'm just buy today a nice SoundBlaster PCI 128 and when i read the documentation i can't avoid one dude. The kernel is 2.4.5 and i have sound "built in", es1370 "built in" and oss like "module" and 100% SoundBlasters like "module" too. Okey, the thin

Slackware 8.0

2001-07-02 Thread Richard Adams
Hello All. Those of you who are subscribed to Slackware-announce will have received the following announcement, for any others who could possably be thinking of slackware here is the news, or at least the first part of the message. The first major release for 2001, Slackware Linux 8.0 continues

Re: Boot Disc Construction Time Again

2001-07-02 Thread Philips
Oliver Ob wrote: > > Philips schrieb: > > > > Oliver Ob wrote: > > > > > > Hi mates, > > > this is for some boot disk concerns. > > > > > > I want to learn how to create my own Linux boot disk using which > > > I can run a REAL TIGHT linux from this disk. > > > > > > Any pointer to valueable text

Re: Boot Disc Construction Time Again

2001-07-02 Thread Oliver Ob
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > > On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Oliver Ob wrote: > > > Hi mates, > > this is for some boot disk concerns. > > > > I want to learn how to create my own Linux boot disk using which > > I can run a REAL TIGHT linux from this disk. > > To start a linux system, you need a kernel _

Re: Boot Disc Construction Time Again

2001-07-02 Thread Oliver Ob
Philips schrieb: > > Oliver Ob wrote: > > > > Hi mates, > > this is for some boot disk concerns. > > > > I want to learn how to create my own Linux boot disk using which > > I can run a REAL TIGHT linux from this disk. > > > > Any pointer to valueable texts, what I plan is this: > > > > Boot Linu

Re: Boot Disc Construction Time Again

2001-07-02 Thread Oliver Ob
Richard Adams schrieb: > > On Sun, 01 Jul 2001, Oliver Ob wrote: > > Hi mates, > > this is for some boot disk concerns. > > > > I want to learn how to create my own Linux boot disk using which > > I can run a REAL TIGHT linux from this disk. > > > > Any pointer to valueable texts, what I plan is

Re: Boot Disc Construction Time Again

2001-07-02 Thread Philips
Oliver Ob wrote: > > Hi mates, > this is for some boot disk concerns. > > I want to learn how to create my own Linux boot disk using which > I can run a REAL TIGHT linux from this disk. > > Any pointer to valueable texts, what I plan is this: > > Boot Linux incl. Network > Run insmod ppa for

File System Trees.

2001-07-02 Thread Geoff Bagley
I understand that various strains of UNIX and LINUX may have differing file heirarchy structures (trees). If so, is this intentional or accidental, and are developers trying to converge on, for example, FHS 2.0 ? I am configuring two Linux machines, and I want to use the "correct" FHS whatever