At 12:43 AM 8/16/02 -0400, Matthew Stapleton wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>I am having some difficulty setting up X windows in a Slackware system.
>Under Win95/98 my video card can handle 24bit resolution. However when I
>try to tell the xf86config in Linux utility that this is the res. that I
>wish to u
Hi Peter.
Here's the relevant headers this time...
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Peter wrote:
> Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.116.70.75])
> by phoenix.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
> id 17f98e-00015h-00
> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 02:09:24 +0100
> Received:
Hello all,
I am having some difficulty setting up X windows in a Slackware system.
Under Win95/98 my video card can handle 24bit resolution. However when I
try to tell the xf86config in Linux utility that this is the res. that I
wish to use, it reports errors when I enter 'startx'. Apparently i
yeah! sending encrypted email to the list rocks!
---Original Message---
>From: Criss Ozkan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Date: 8/15/2002 4:00:00 PM
>Subject: Re: 2seks
>
>SGljIGJpciB5ZXJkZSBidWx1cCBpemxleW
Hic bir yerde bulup izleyemeyeceginiz icerigi size http://www.2seks.com sunuyor.
TURK VE AVRUPALI AMATOR KIZLAR
BULGAR KIZLARI
ROMEN HATUNLAR
TURK TECAVUZ FILMLERI
KIZLAR YURDU
ALMANYA'NIN SAPIK HATUNLARI
OTELDEKI GIZLI KAMERALAR
VE DAHASI...
Hepsi orjinal ve kaliteli kayitlar. Hemen gi
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Ray Olszewski wrote:
> As I indicated in my message to Lawson, "static" is a tricky term, with an
> assortment of context-dependent meanings. It is messy enough that you
> should take what I write next with a grain of salt, since it is easy to get
> mixed up here.
>
> Both .a
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Ray Olszewski wrote:
> At 12:17 PM 8/15/02 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >In case you want to make a static executable (one that does not require
> >dynamic linking. Nost distro's link /sbin/ldconfig static so you can
> >use it to recover when you mess up your librar
At 07:25 PM 8/15/02 +0200, Axel Siebenwirth wrote:
>Hi Ray!
>
>What is the difference between the linking that gcc does i.e. to link many
>object files into an executable and the linking that ld does?
>Is it really that gcc is just to link object files together to an executable
>and ld is there t
As I indicated in my message to Lawson, "static" is a tricky term, with an
assortment of context-dependent meanings. It is messy enough that you
should take what I write next with a grain of salt, since it is easy to get
mixed up here.
Both .a and .so libraries get linked at runtime. .a linkin
Hi All,
While on the topic of linking, could anyone tell me
why a C source file compiles alright, but gives
"Symbol not found" errors during linking? I mean, how
is the error, "symbol _ABC not found" different from
"function xyz not found"?
Regards,
Abhijit.
Hi Ray!
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Ray Olszewski wrote:
> Depends on how you link. Modern linking is done dynamically (only one copy
> of the library is loaded into memory and shared by all apps that use it),
> using .so libraries. Older linking was done statically (each app loaded its
> own person
Hi Ray!
What is the difference between the linking that gcc does i.e. to link many
object files into an executable and the linking that ld does?
Is it really that gcc is just to link object files together to an executable
and ld is there to link object files to an shared library?
Thank you,
Axe
At 12:17 PM 8/15/02 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Ray Olszewski wrote:
>
> > It's been so long since I used a .a libraries, I didn't recall how they
> > were created. They are the old-format libraries I referred to above. They
> > are kept around, at least on full-size Linu
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Ray Olszewski wrote:
> It's been so long since I used a .a libraries, I didn't recall how they
> were created. They are the old-format libraries I referred to above. They
> are kept around, at least on full-size Linux installs, mainly for legacy
> reasons. Don't use them unle
If you have not seen your mail on the list, then almost certainly something
is wrong at your end. This is the *third* time I have seen this message
this morning.
Are you sure you are subscribed?
Might your MTA or MUA be filtering out messages that are From: your own
address?
At 05:34 PM 8/15
Sorry, I haven't seen my mail get to the list. So here goes it again.
- Forwarded message from Axel Siebenwirth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Hi,
I have some stupid questions.
What makes the difference between .o and .so files? What is their use? Is it
just a naming convention?
When I want to
I changed the Subject: line to refer to the question you actually asked.
At 03:44 PM 8/15/02 +0200, Axel Siebenwirth wrote:
>Me again.
>
>Whats the use of stripping object files of their symbols. Symbols reflect
>the functions in an object file, right?
Stripping makes the files smaller, which m
Me again.
Whats the use of stripping object files of their symbols. Symbols reflect
the functions in an object file, right?
Axel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/
Hi,
I have some stupid questions.
What makes the difference between .o and .so files? What is their use? Is it
just a naming convention?
When I want to link libraries to a program I am compiling, of what format do
the libraries have to be?
I have found out that .a files are archives created w
19 matches
Mail list logo
