>> > The STB 4Com card came to me used, I have attempted to set the card up
>> in a manner as such:
>> >
>> > setserial /dev/ttyS04 baud_base 9600 irq 15 port 0x03E8 ^fourport
>> ^skip_test
>> > setserial /dev/ttyS03 baud_base 9600 irq 15 port 0x02F8 ^fourport
>> ^skip_test
>> > set
>> OK. Since you've only been testing ttyS01 (the first of the 4 ports), we
>> really do not know if the others are working or not. Your cabling looks
>> good (subject to one hesitation; see below) and your other test standards
>> look good too. So I'm drawn to the difference between the
On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Alan Womack wrote:
> The STB 4Com card came to me used, I have attempted to set the card up in a manner
>as such:
>
> setserial /dev/ttyS04 baud_base 9600 irq 15 port 0x03E8 ^fourport ^skip_test
> setserial /dev/ttyS03 baud_base 9600 irq 15 port 0x02F8 ^fourport ^skip_test
> s
On 2 Nov 2002, Heimo Claasen wrote:
...
>
> AND X had run perfectly as usual at the last boot before.
>
> ?!?
Try something like
startx 2>&1 |tee ~/oops
and read on ~/oops what it used as a FontPath.
Maybe it has only
unix/:7101
or so and xfs is not running?
This is also a good way to see whe
On Sat, 2 Nov 2002, Michael Scondo wrote:
> > #!/bin/bash
> > ##copy a directory or partition
> > tar -C "$1" -cOl . | tar -C "$2" -xpf -
> >
>
> That's an idea, but I believe parted should be much faster.
> I think compressing and decompressing would be a little bit slow ?
>
It's not compressing
Never mind... It would appear that I'm not R'ing T F'ing M. At least
not properly.
I apologize for wasting you folks' time :)
Chris R.
==
Silence is golden.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordo
Paul Furness wrote:
This does, however, have the disadvantage that your existing partitions
are copied but not resized. Eventually, you end up with lots of little
partitions (after a couple of hard disk upgrades...)
you are absolutely right. I allready lost the old 256 MB swap
partition. (un
OK. Since you've only been testing ttyS01 (the first of the 4 ports), we
really do not know if the others are working or not. Your cabling looks
good (subject to one hesitation; see below) and your other test standards
look good too. So I'm drawn to the difference between the first STB 4Com
por
I have a chance to get back to this issue, it appears actually that none of the STB
4Com ports are working "correctly" I can get some "data" from od -v /dev/ttyS01 but it
is a file of ^@ the control character and the longer I leave it up the more it gets
whether data is being sent or not. I hav
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 07:59:03PM +, Heimo Claasen wrote:
> device". Puzzled control gives indeed, the 2 (!) GB root-"/" partition
> being "100 % used" - ultimate bezarrerie, as quite lately before, it
> was checked (precisely in view of an eventual, and quite bulky addition
> of Java) and fou
10 matches
Mail list logo
