On Friday 10 January 2003 20:02, Hal MacArgle wrote:
> UtHo: I had no idea my Reply To: field was wrong in
> the past.. I have changed nothing. It's in, and has been for some
> time, in my .muttrc file.. Let me make a quick check: According to
> the date I've not made a change to .mu
My current partition table has the following partitions
1) FAT32
2) FAT32
3) Extended
Is it possible for me to make partitions 1 and 2 one partition and get it to
renumber 3 as 2 (the first bit is easy, but how would I make the latter part
happen)
--
"MS-DOS is to computing as the black plag
On 01-10, pa3gcu wrote:
> On Friday 10 January 2003 14:09, Hal MacArgle wrote:
> > Greetings: Contemplating an ISP change I thought I'd ping the present
> > thence the proposed DNS's to evaluate the round trip time..
> >
> > The present, 204.97.4.2, returned it's RTT to be expected.. The
> > propos
At 09:09 10/01/2003 -0500, Hal MacArgle wrote:
>Greetings: Contemplating an ISP change I thought I'd ping the present
>thence the proposed DNS's to evaluate the round trip time..
>
>The present, 204.97.4.2, returned it's RTT to be expected.. The
>proposed, 65.196.16.3, returned "100% packet loss" -
On Friday 10 January 2003 14:09, Hal MacArgle wrote:
> Greetings: Contemplating an ISP change I thought I'd ping the present
> thence the proposed DNS's to evaluate the round trip time..
>
> The present, 204.97.4.2, returned it's RTT to be expected.. The
> proposed, 65.196.16.3, returned "100% pack
Greetings: Contemplating an ISP change I thought I'd ping the present
thence the proposed DNS's to evaluate the round trip time..
The present, 204.97.4.2, returned it's RTT to be expected.. The
proposed, 65.196.16.3, returned "100% packet loss" - not expected.
Both addresses are in /etc/resolv.co
