2.5.59: Kernel: No module found in object

2003-02-27 Thread Eng Se-Hsieng
Dear all, I have to get the Nokia D211 working in the 2.5.59 kernel. I tweaked the driver files (which are meant for 2.4.x kernels) and it compiles and installs fine but when I insert the PCMCIA device, I get: cardmgr[1302]: socket 0: Nokia D211 cardmgr[1302]: executing: 'modprobe nokia_cs' cardm

Re: distribution choice

2003-02-27 Thread whitnl73
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Ray Olszewski wrote: > Probably about as informative as RPMs are. That is to say, good but not > great. Package names usually make sense, and searchig the package cache > usually finds what you want. But sometimes your search terms are too vague > to work ... you recall recent

Re: distribution choice

2003-02-27 Thread james niland
As all posters before have been quite wholesome on your questions,so I don't want add much more to that. Debian seems to be a good choice, especially the packet manager apt-get can make your life a lot easier than rpm based distributions can. I thought I might just mention my favourite/pet distri

Re: distribution choice

2003-02-27 Thread Ray Olszewski
Haines -- Your reply posed a couple of new questions. I'm limiting these comments to answering them. At 06:07 PM 2/27/2003 -0500, Haines Brown wrote: [...] > Hardware *detection* is a different issue, and on that score, Debian > fares poorly ... unless you use very mainstream stuff, you have to >

Re: distribution choice

2003-02-27 Thread Haines Brown
Ray, Your frank comments are very much appreciated, especially for such a nuisance question as I posed. > Rather than pretend to an expertise I don't have, I'll try to be > helpful by commenting on how well Debian fits with each of your > criteria. I'm inclined in that direction, so your comment

Re: distribution choice

2003-02-27 Thread Haines Brown
Yes, it is usually kind of a pointless question, for basically, all the main distrubutions are the same, and the differences may be nothing more than a matter of personal choice. I'm inclined toward Debian, for I don't care for the direction I think Red Hat is headed. The alternative to it might b

RE: iptables & a dhcpd question

2003-02-27 Thread Weigand, Benjamin
I'm not a bsd-ish kinda guy, but: If "/etc/rc.d/rc.firewall start" doesn't work, check to see that there is an interpreter defined for the script. (first line should say "#!/xxx/xxx"). -bw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in the body of a message to [EMAI

Re: iptables & a dhcpd question

2003-02-27 Thread pa3gcu
On Thursday 27 February 2003 20:00, Eckhardt, Rodolpho H. O. wrote: > I don't know if this is what you are asking but. > > I've never worked with Slackware, but try this: > > /etc/(PATH TO rc.firewall)/rc.firewall > > and when they say dhcpd stop, you have to add the path to it in the front: > > /e

Re: iptables & a dhcpd question

2003-02-27 Thread Brian P. Bilbrey
On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 15:41, Paul wrote: > Thanks for all the info! Quick follow up question on the rc.firewall script. > I've tried running it, just by typing it's name when I'm in that folder at > root. It says, "bash: rc.firewall-2.4: command not found" It's actually > named, "rc.firewall-2.4"

Re: iptables & a dhcpd question

2003-02-27 Thread Jos Lemmerling
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Paul wrote: > Thanks for all the info! Quick follow up question on the rc.firewall script. > I've tried running it, just by typing it's name when I'm in that folder at > root. It says, "bash: rc.firewall-2.4: command not found" It's actually > named, "rc.firewall-2.4" and I'

Re: iptables & a dhcpd question

2003-02-27 Thread Paul
Thanks for all the info! Quick follow up question on the rc.firewall script. I've tried running it, just by typing it's name when I'm in that folder at root. It says, "bash: rc.firewall-2.4: command not found" It's actually named, "rc.firewall-2.4" and I've made it executable already, it has a *

Re: iptables & a dhcpd question

2003-02-27 Thread Ray Olszewski
At 01:53 PM 2/27/2003 -0600, Paul wrote: two genuine newbie questions :) FYI: I'm running Slackware 8.1, (kernel = 2.4.18, iptables = 1.2.6a, dhcpd ISC v3.0pl1) Q1. I've been tweaking my rc.firewall script a bit lately and am wondering if there is a way to have my new one take effect without reboo

Re: distribution choice

2003-02-27 Thread Ray Olszewski
I think Brian's general response here is right on target. Most of us know (and like) one distribution, and perhaps know a bit about one or two others. But I very much doubt any of us is in a real position honestly to compare all (or even all the major) distributions available. Rather than prete

iptables & a dhcpd question

2003-02-27 Thread Paul
two genuine newbie questions :) FYI: I'm running Slackware 8.1, (kernel = 2.4.18, iptables = 1.2.6a, dhcpd ISC v3.0pl1) Q1. I've been tweaking my rc.firewall script a bit lately and am wondering if there is a way to have my new one take effect without rebooting? Q2. Second, I'm still trying to g

Re: iptables & a dhcpd question

2003-02-27 Thread Eckhardt, Rodolpho H. O.
I don't know if this is what you are asking but. I've never worked with Slackware, but try this: /etc/(PATH TO rc.firewall)/rc.firewall and when they say dhcpd stop, you have to add the path to it in the front: /etc/init.d/dhcpd stop (if /etc/init.d is the path) I hope this works, Rodolpho -

Re: distribution choice

2003-02-27 Thread Brian Jackson
You are going to get as many different answers to this question as you would what's you favorite $something. Only bad part about that is that most people who answer these questions have never really used more than 1 or 2 distributions.(usually the first one they try doesn't work so they blame it

Re: distribution choice

2003-02-27 Thread pa3gcu
On Thursday 27 February 2003 18:59, Haines Brown wrote: Trim. > In light of this, which distributions should I be considering? Does > one of them stand out in your opinion as an obvious choice in light of > my criteria? Slackware. > > Haines -- Regards Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.

[no subject]

2003-02-27 Thread n mishra
Hi all, I am trying to write a program in c to be able to search a file for any pattern which will be given by the user at runtime.Basically a search tool. Could someone suggest a good way of doing this.I've heard of lex and yacc and also awk.Which one is better or is there any other option. Or

distribution choice

2003-02-27 Thread Haines Brown
I've always used Red Hat. My installation of 7.3 began to go sour last fall after a clumbsy video driver installation. Things got more and more complicated, and I ended up having to do a fresh install of Red Hats 8.0. Since then, things just have not worked right and I'm spending all to much of my