Hi,
I have a few basic questions on the kernel performance:
1) For embedded systems, even though standard linux may not have hard
real-time performance unless real-time patch, low latency patch are
applied, I would like to know if linux can give "deterministic"
performance. Meaning can we be guar
Sorry for this petty question.
There's a web page that displays a jpeg image that changes every
minute and would make an interesting background image for my monitor
(obviously, I have a continuous connection).
What I have is a url to a webpage that displays the .jpg and defines
its size. How wou
if you look up
NAT
masq
and iptables
you'll find all the information you need
A good place to start is
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/IP-Masquerade-HOWTO/
Sincerely,
John T. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "J S" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "linux-newbie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
I am new to Linux
We are developing a device on which we plan to run Linux. The device
will use some processor like MIPs, PowerPC, etc.
What I want to know is :
1) can the standard bootloader like LILO work with these devices also or
do each device have their own bootloaders ?
2) how
At 11:08 PM 5/29/2003 -0400, J S wrote:
Linux people,
I'm trying to understand how to set up a Linux system as a router. For
example, assume I have an interface with IP address 192.168.0.1(eth0)
and another with IP address 192.168.1.1(eth1). What do I need to do to
allow traffic received on one
Linux people,
I'm trying to understand how to set up a Linux system as a router. For
example, assume I have an interface with IP address 192.168.0.1(eth0)
and another with IP address 192.168.1.1(eth1). What do I need to do to
allow traffic received on one interface to be automatically forwarded
James Miller wrote:
> Seems like this should work. Isn't Slack the distro that asks you which
> kernel image you want to install at the very end of the install process?
Uh, huh. But I have always simply used the boot floppy and then
compiled my own kernel later. :-|
Chuck
>
> James
> -
On Thu, 29 May 2003, pa3gcu wrote:
> >
> > As of now I've concluded the only _easy_ way out is to termporarily
> > fit an IDE CD for the install and then re-fit the SCSI CD.. What do
> > YOU think??? Appreciate!!
>
> There could be another way;
> I have installed slackware 9 on a couple of machines
Hal MacArgle wrote:
>
> Greetings: Slackware 8.1.01 installs easily on our machines with an
^^^
Do a 'nfs' install with the CD mounted on one of the other machines.
-or-
If you can boot any OS to the IDE/SCSI machine, copy the CD contents
On Thursday 29 May 2003 22:54, Hal MacArgle wrote:
> Greetings: Slackware 8.1.01 installs easily on our machines with an
> IDE HD and IDE CD, booting the CD nicely and installing from the CD,
> with the BIOS set properly..
>
> However; the subject machine has an IDE 20gB HD and a __SCSI CD__,
> wit
Greetings: Slackware 8.1.01 installs easily on our machines with an
IDE HD and IDE CD, booting the CD nicely and installing from the CD,
with the BIOS set properly..
However; the subject machine has an IDE 20gB HD and a __SCSI CD__,
with a BusLogic SCSI card, creating an insurmountable problem - s
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Alan: Is there any likelihood that Linux could be tweaked to provide a
> > similar facility using the 11-character volume labels available
> > in the various FAT formats?
>
> I've no idea what the mount tool owners have planned - the label handl
12 matches
Mail list logo
