On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 06:47:42 +0100 (BST), Ankit Jain
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> in this file i have a doubt if this is the physical
> address
> it basically looks from -
>
> which is 0-4294967295
>
> i feel after that there is a mapping for physical
> address
>
> if somebody can
in this file i have a doubt if this is the physical
address
it basically looks from -
which is 0-4294967295
i feel after that there is a mapping for physical
address
if somebody can explain me this
thanks
ankit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ankit]$ cat //proc/iomem
-0009fbff : Syst
--- chuck gelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ankit Jain wrote:
>
> >thanks a lot for help
> >
> >but at this moment i am trying to find out what
> >services i should stop with this redhat-config
> service
> >
> >and also i am confused in 1 more topic. top shows a
> >col on priority under PRI and
hi
if somebody knows the difference b/w /PRI of both
these commands because both give different results
ps -Al
&
top
as per priority rule we can set priority upto 0-99
but top never shows this high priority
thanks
ankit
__
In That case, also. There is a implicit Swap area and a Explicit area.
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 12:07:21 -0400, Pratik Solanki
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 10:37:40 +0100 (BST), Ankit Jain
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > well if we dont have a swap area then shall i say my
> > syste
chuck gelm wrote:
Pratik Solanki wrote:
[CCing linux-newbie]
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 18:21:57 +0100 (BST), Ankit Jain
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
well i dont know exactly but somewhat i feel that
there must be some way to disable the virtual memory.
yaa of course there should be some way. it is not th
Ankit Jain wrote:
thanks a lot for help
but at this moment i am trying to find out what
services i should stop with this redhat-config service
Pretty much anything you aren't going to use - if it's a desktop
machine, for example, you don't need sendmail running, for example.
As I mentioned befo
Ankit Jain wrote:
thanks a lot for help
but at this moment i am trying to find out what
services i should stop with this redhat-config service
and also i am confused in 1 more topic. top shows a
col on priority under PRI and also ps -Al shows a col
of priority i.e PRI what is the difference b/w bot
Pratik Solanki wrote:
[CCing linux-newbie]
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 18:21:57 +0100 (BST), Ankit Jain
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
well i dont know exactly but somewhat i feel that
there must be some way to disable the virtual memory.
yaa of course there should be some way. it is not that
sys cant work w
[CCing linux-newbie]
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 18:21:57 +0100 (BST), Ankit Jain
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> well i dont know exactly but somewhat i feel that
> there must be some way to disable the virtual memory.
> yaa of course there should be some way. it is not that
> sys cant work without it
Yes,
Yes. 32 bit address = 2^32 addresses = 4GB
For a 64-bit machine, the limit is 2^64.
Pratik.
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 17:06:56 +0100 (BST), Ankit Jain
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> why limit is upto 4 GB is it due to address bus limit?
>
> thanks
>
> ankit
> --- Pratik Solanki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> w
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 06:41:38 -0400, chuck gelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ankit Jain wrote:
>
> >how will u differentiate virtual memory and swap area
> >
> >thanks
> >
> >ankit
> >
> >
> Virtual memory is swap area in use.
umm. A running system can or cannot have swap. Correct me if I am
wrong
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 10:37:40 +0100 (BST), Ankit Jain
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> well if we dont have a swap area then shall i say my
> system dosent have virtual memory
No.
> is this correct? because i feel even if this swap area
> is not there then also virtual memory concept exists?
Virtual m
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 10:37:40 +0100 (BST), Ankit Jain
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> well if we dont have a swap area then shall i say my
> system dosent have virtual memory
No.
> is this correct? because i feel even if this swap area
> is not there then also virtual memory concept exists?
Virtual
thanks a lot for help
but at this moment i am trying to find out what
services i should stop with this redhat-config service
and also i am confused in 1 more topic. top shows a
col on priority under PRI and also ps -Al shows a col
of priority i.e PRI what is the difference b/w both
becaz both sho
what is this doing
thanks
ankit
--- Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Want to free memory?
>
> $ free
> total used free shared
> buffers cached
> Mem:223708 220120 3588 0
> 28356 107936
> -/+ buffers/cache: 83828
I'd like to install and use jedit on Fedora Core 2.
I understand that it requires that java be installed first. When I yum
for either java or jedit, neither package is found.
I went to Sun's site to get java but it was too confusing for a newbie.
Can anyone explain how to install these packages
Ankit Jain wrote:
how will u differentiate virtual memory and swap area
thanks
ankit
Virtual memory is swap area in use.
Regards, Chuck
--- chuck gelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ankit Jain wrote:
hi
if somebody can tell me that is this correct?
(1)can i say that swap area created by lin
Ankit Jain wrote:
well if we dont have a swap area then shall i say my
system dosent have virtual memory
Yes, I think so. I think that it is difficult to say that a system
has no 'swap area', because a 'swap area' could be a file.
How can you be sure that none of the files on a system are
a 'sw
Jim Nelson wrote:
Ray Olszewski wrote:
At 02:43 AM 10/7/2004 -0400, Karthik Vishwanath wrote:
Hello,
I develop a monte-carlo code written in standard C. I recently
decided to
"add features" to the previous stable version and now the code
aborts with
a Segmentation fault. I suspect the code is exe
well if we dont have a swap area then shall i say my
system dosent have virtual memory
is this correct? because i feel even if this swap area
is not there then also virtual memory concept exists?
thanks
ankit
--- kernel kernel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Virtual Memory is a policy. Swap Area
Ray Olszewski wrote:
At 02:43 AM 10/7/2004 -0400, Karthik Vishwanath wrote:
Hello,
I develop a monte-carlo code written in standard C. I recently
decided to
"add features" to the previous stable version and now the code aborts
with
a Segmentation fault. I suspect the code is executing different p
Virtual Memory is a policy. Swap Area is a artifact, u use to
implement this policy
Hope makes sense
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 10:15:15 +0100 (BST), Ankit Jain
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how will u differentiate virtual memory and swap area
>
> thanks
>
> ankit
> --- chuck gelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
how will u differentiate virtual memory and swap area
thanks
ankit
--- chuck gelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ankit Jain wrote:
>
> >hi
> >
> >if somebody can tell me that is this correct?
> >
> >(1)can i say that swap area created by linux is
> nothign
> >but virtual memory. (2)is it correct
At 02:43 AM 10/7/2004 -0400, Karthik Vishwanath wrote:
Hello,
I develop a monte-carlo code written in standard C. I recently decided to
"add features" to the previous stable version and now the code aborts with
a Segmentation fault. I suspect the code is executing different parts of
the code before
25 matches
Mail list logo
