Re: continuing (pdf) font frustrations

On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Ray Olszewski wrote: > 3. Are the fonts all mode 644? (The actual fonts > in /usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts/, not the symlinks). Probably; you said > you checked that already. And if other apps workm, that too indicates the > problem is specific to the PDF font corrspondences.

Re: physical address?

what tells that this is a laptop? 6800-68000fff : Texas Instruments PCI1225 68001000-68001fff : Texas Instruments PCI1225 (#2) Texas Instruments CardBus slots. Educated guess - there are CardBus-to-PCI adapters available, but are pretty rare - not the kind of things that you'd see in a n

Re: address limitation

Ankit Jain wrote: hi well i am not able ot understand this... there are lot many more problems /proc/iomem -0009fbff : System RAM 0009fc00-0009 : reserved 000a-000b : Video RAM area 000c-000c7fff : Video ROM 000f-000f : System ROM 0010-077e : System RAM 00100

Re: continuing (pdf) font frustrations

The added info you provide below, along with my quick check of the file you sent to me offlist, all says you are right that you have a font problem. And I am probably right that it is specific to Helvetica (or almost specific to it ... the errors you list below indicate a bit of a problem with

Re: physical address?

Ankit Jain wrote: thanks a lot for helping all the way see inline --- Jim Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ankit Jain wrote: hi http://www.xml.com/ldd/chapter/book/ch02.html -0009fbff : System RAM 0009fc00-0009 : reserved 000a-000b : Video RAM area 000c-000c7fff :

Re: continuing (pdf) font frustrations

On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Ray Olszewski wrote: Thanks for your response, Ray. > 1. Just to eliminate possible rookie error ... do you know that the > "certain" .pdf files are themselves good? Can you read them on Windows > using Acrobat, or could you previously read it on this system? You've > almost

Re: continuing (pdf) font frustrations

At 12:09 PM 10/8/2004 -0500, James Miller wrote: Sorry to beat a dead horse over these font problems, but it's really bothering me and interfering with my work. I've posted on this before, but the issue remains unresolved. Previously I complained about a couple of apps as having some font problem

continuing (pdf) font frustrations

Sorry to beat a dead horse over these font problems, but it's really bothering me and interfering with my work. I've posted on this before, but the issue remains unresolved. Previously I complained about a couple of apps as having some font problems: browsers (Mozilla and Opera) and pdf viewers (

Re: VM Vs Swap space

On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 18:13:52 -0400, chuck gelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pratik Solanki wrote: > > >[CCing linux-newbie] > > > >On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 18:21:57 +0100 (BST), Ankit Jain > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>well i dont know exactly but somewhat i feel that > >>there must be some

Re: Heavy load of graphics

Now that I better understand your goal, let me try to offer some suggestions. First, try using "ps aux" to get a more readable, and complete, picture of your memory use. "top" sorts by recent activity in its default setting, and that is not the best way to find what processes are using the most m

address limitation

hi well i am not able ot understand this... there are lot many more problems /proc/iomem -0009fbff : System RAM 0009fc00-0009 : reserved 000a-000b : Video RAM area 000c-000c7fff : Video ROM 000f-000f : System ROM 0010-077e : System RAM 0010-00250d5b : K

Re: physical address?

thanks a lot for helping all the way see inline --- Jim Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ankit Jain wrote: > > >hi > > > >http://www.xml.com/ldd/chapter/book/ch02.html > > > > -0009fbff : System RAM > > 0009fc00-0009 : reserved > > 000a-000b : Video RAM area > > 000c

Re: are they physical address?

Ankit Jain wrote: hi http://www.xml.com/ldd/chapter/book/ch02.html -0009fbff : System RAM 0009fc00-0009 : reserved 000a-000b : Video RAM area 000c-000c7fff : Video ROM 000f-000f : System ROM 0010-03fe : System RAM 0010-0022c557 : Kernel code 0022c558-00

Re: are they physical address?

On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 08:14:25 +0100 (BST), Ankit Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi > > http://www.xml.com/ldd/chapter/book/ch02.html > > -0009fbff : System RAM > 0009fc00-0009 : reserved > 000a-000b : Video RAM area > 000c-000c7fff : Video ROM > 000f-000f : System

are they physical address?

hi http://www.xml.com/ldd/chapter/book/ch02.html -0009fbff : System RAM 0009fc00-0009 : reserved 000a-000b : Video RAM area 000c-000c7fff : Video ROM 000f-000f : System ROM 0010-03fe : System RAM 0010-0022c557 : Kernel code 0022c558-0024455f :