On Tuesday 16 November 2004 05:01, Peter wrote:
> Thank you so much Richard!
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > I seem to remember you mentioning that you had compiled a new kernel.???
> > If that is true then maybe you did not define your IDE chipset, if that
> > is the case then that is your problem
Thank you so much Richard!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I seem to remember you mentioning that you had compiled a new kernel.??? If
> that is true then maybe you did not define your IDE chipset, if that is the
> case then that is your problem as the kernel will fall back onto, "slow but
> works on an
On Thursday 11 November 2004 16:58, Richard Adams wrote:
> I would go as far as saying its NOT you or your hardware at fault,many have
> problems with DMA and friends at the minute.
> One draw back of using an up to date kernel which has not been widely
> tested.
Sorry it took me a long while to r
