On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 22:22, Ankit Jain wrote:
> Which is more efficient? /if both perform the same
> work and are not different then why shoudl we have 2 ?
As far as I know, locate is based on a database storing locations of
file. It doesnot search physically throughout the directory hierarchy.
S
Which is more efficient? /if both perform the same
work and are not different then why shoudl we have 2 ?
thanks
ankit jain
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
your friends today! Download Messenger Now
http
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 06:48:00 -0500, Simon Valiquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jagadeesh Bhaskar P a écrit :
> >
> >>and also made a minimalist OS for a MC68000 microcontroler
> >>(only basic process support without even support for a filesystem).
> >
> >
> >
> > I too want to learn something li
Jagadeesh Bhaskar P a écrit :
and also made a minimalist OS for a MC68000 microcontroler
(only basic process support without even support for a filesystem).
I too want to learn something like a minimalist OS. Where to start
digging?
I'm not too sure. In my case, I started mixing assembly lan
The basic mistake is that the variable values have not changed.
1/0 will generate a FPE no matter what you do.
use variables like a=0;b=1;
and if b/a generates an FPE,
change its value.(bit hazy how to implement this... google around)
the reason for giving you a signal handler
is obviously to help
Ray Olszewski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) schrieb:
> Relative to your comments, James, I fear I can only echo your lack of
> success. I recently was investigating, specifically, English-Spanish
> translation. While I did find a couple of Linux apps that function at the
> dictionary level ... translating wo
On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 14:49, Manish Regmi wrote:
> see man kill, raise
Thank you. I got that!!
--
With regards,
Jagadeesh Bhaskar P
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:35:24 +0530, Jagadeesh Bhaskar P
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 14:27, Yogesh Bute wrote:
> > hi,
> > u need to inform the shell that the signal is handled - so u need to
> > SIG_IGN the singal ie. signal (signum, SIG_IGN) once u have done with
> > han
> How can I generate and send a signal from a function of mine? Is it
> possible from a userlevel C program, using some functions like
> signal()??
>
> Please do help
> --
> With regards,
>
> Jagadeesh Bhaskar P
>
yes,
see man kill, raise
regards manish
--
Manish Regmi
-
To unsubscribe from
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:30:46 +0530, Jagadeesh Bhaskar P
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > BTW:
> > Linux Kernel is better discussed in kernelnewbies site.
> > www.kernelnewbies.org
>
> I had seen this site. But didnt get which address to subscribe for and
> which to post the queries. Can u help me o
On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 14:27, Yogesh Bute wrote:
> hi,
> u need to inform the shell that the signal is handled - so u need to
> SIG_IGN the singal ie. signal (signum, SIG_IGN) once u have done with
> handling the signal
> or u could send SIG_DFL, so that default singal handler will handle th
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:27:40 +0530, Jagadeesh Bhaskar P
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You are generating a divide by zero exception (on i386) which is a
> > fault (it means the instruction is restartable). So what happens is
> > you catch an exception and print and return. The same code is
> > res
I read that the init process is the first actual process to run, and it
spawns all other processes even including the shell. So I wanted to
explore the same aspect, and study what happens in such a case, like,
zombie process and all!!
So is that possible to be done
On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 13:48, Man
Hi Manish,
As suggested, I rewrote the C program using sigaction, as follows:
/** start of code **/
#include
#include
void fe(int x){
printf("floating pt exception:\n");
}
int main(void){
struct sigaction p;
p.sa_handler = fe;
sigaction(SIGFPE, &
14 matches
Mail list logo