On 1/23/07, Rajat Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/23/07, sandeep lahane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I dont know much about SMP scheduling but after thinking a while I came up
with
> following inference, please correct me if I am wrong.
>
> If the ISR and the interrupted process are sharing
On 1/23/07, Daniel Rodrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I read that ISRs can never cause a page fault. Why is that? What would
> > happen if an ISR tries to use a data item that has been swapped out?
> Just a guess, when page fault occurs, page fault handler is invoked
> which is a
On 1/23/07, sandeep lahane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/23/07, Daniel Rodrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I read that ISRs can never cause a page fault. Why is that? What would
> > > happen if an ISR tries to use a data item that has been swapped out?
>
> > Just a guess, w
On 1/23/07, Daniel Rodrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I read that ISRs can never cause a page fault. Why is that? What would
> > happen if an ISR tries to use a data item that has been swapped out?
> Just a guess, when page fault occurs, page fault handler is invoked
> which is a
> Hi,
>
> I read that ISRs can never cause a page fault. Why is that? What would
> happen if an ISR tries to use a data item that has been swapped out?
Just a guess, when page fault occurs, page fault handler is invoked
which is another ISR. This page fault handler handler does the
required stu
On 1/23/07, sandeep lahane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I dont know much about SMP scheduling but after thinking a while I came up with
following inference, please correct me if I am wrong.
If the ISR and the interrupted process are sharing the stack i.e. of
the ISR doesnt have its own seperate st
Just a guess, when page fault occurs, page fault handler is invoked
which is another ISR. This page fault handler handler does the
required stuff like bringing the data in to memory etc. This
introduces delays , and delayes are not supposed to be there in ISR. I
think when a process causes a page
I dont know much about SMP scheduling but after thinking a while I came up with
following inference, please correct me if I am wrong.
If the ISR and the interrupted process are sharing the stack i.e. of
the ISR doesnt have its own seperate stack in that case moving the
interrupted process will be
Hi,
If an executing process is interrupted by an interrupt, is it ensured
that it won't get transferred to another idle CPU in the system??
This would mean that despite the fact that a CPU is idle in the
system, still the process will wait untill the ISR finishes its
execution?
Thanks,
Rick
-
Hi,
I read that ISRs can never cause a page fault. Why is that? What would
happen if an ISR tries to use a data item that has been swapped out?
Thanks,
Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info
10 matches
Mail list logo