Joseph Jackson wrote:
> wow how rude. Why would you call his or anyone elses question stupid? if
> you can't help you shouldn't reply to posts.
I'm really sorry for my syntactical error. What I meant to be stupid was
my question I asked ;) since I do not know what the promiscuous mode is.
When
Hi,
I have a problem. It's quite easily explained:
/dev/hdc3 5119972 2181272 2938700 43% /
/dev/hda4 7702924 2414140 5288784 32% /usr
/dev/hdc116421 15819 602 97% /boot
/dev/hda2 2819312 2720872 98440 97% /home
/d
Hi Tom!
On Mon, 20 May 2002, Tom Beer wrote:
> amanda, some month ago. I thought that the uneven numbers are experimental, but
> the even numbers would be "stable"?
For example in kernel version number 2.4.18
2 is the VERSION
Hi Richard!
On Sun, 19 May 2002, Richard Adams wrote:
> First thing i would do is try a "proven" kernel, 2.5.x i belive is development
> but there again considering the 2.5 kernel series of development is at kernel
> 2.5.11 i presume you mean 2.4.16.?
It really is 2.5.16 and that is where 2.5
Hi,
I alway thought process priorities range from -20 to 19 (also according to
"man nice"). But under kernel 2.5.16 I run top and process is display with
priority 25..
Is there perhaps something wrong?
Thank you,
Axel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
