e that differs from the 952 at the second port, which
has caused a bit more teeth grinding.
The PCI device ID of the real OX16PCI952 was always 9521.
1415:950A:XXXX: is an EXSYS EX41092 card.
1415:9521:: is a card based on a real Oxford OX16PCI952 chip.
So, y
solve the port ordering problem.
Cheers,
Ed
--------
Ed Vance edv (at) macrolink (dot) com
Macrolink, Inc. 1500 N. Kellogg Dr Anaheim, CA 92807
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the lin
nitialization, or is there more
weirdness expected?
Best regards,
Ed
----
Ed Vance edv (at) macrolink (dot) com
Macrolink, Inc. 1500 N. Kellogg Dr Anaheim, CA 92807
-
Sure, go ahead and try the second patch that adds the Netmos cards to the
serial driver's device tables. It is for a somewhat newer rev, but you might
just get offsets with no failed hunks. It's worth a try.
The serial driver will only detect cards that are in the table. It does not
mean that ther
Hi Bryan,
What serial driver initialization messages do you get from dmesg?
Is the "MANY_PORTS" flag present in the list of enabled options?
Which distribution and rev level are you using?
Ed
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Whitehead [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003
