On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 18:13:52 -0400, chuck gelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pratik Solanki wrote:
>
> >[CCing linux-newbie]
> >
> >On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 18:21:57 +0100 (BST), Ankit Jain
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>well i do
rk without it
Yes, you can have a system without virtual memory. Search for MMUless
linux kernel and you'll see patches/websites.
My point was that disabling VM after its been enabled would tough (if
not impossible). Someone correct me if I am wrong here.
Pratik.
> ankit
> --- Pra
Yes. 32 bit address = 2^32 addresses = 4GB
For a 64-bit machine, the limit is 2^64.
Pratik.
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 17:06:56 +0100 (BST), Ankit Jain
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> why limit is upto 4 GB is it due to address bus limit?
>
> thanks
>
> ankit
> --- Pratik S
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 06:41:38 -0400, chuck gelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ankit Jain wrote:
>
> >how will u differentiate virtual memory and swap area
> >
> >thanks
> >
> >ankit
> >
> >
> Virtual memory is swap area in use.
umm. A running system can or cannot have swap. Correct me if I am
wrong
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 10:37:40 +0100 (BST), Ankit Jain
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> well if we dont have a swap area then shall i say my
> system dosent have virtual memory
No.
> is this correct? because i feel even if this swap area
> is not there then also virtual memory concept exists?
Virtual m
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 10:37:40 +0100 (BST), Ankit Jain
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> well if we dont have a swap area then shall i say my
> system dosent have virtual memory
No.
> is this correct? because i feel even if this swap area
> is not there then also virtual memory concept exists?
Virtual
