RE: Syscall() vs _syscallN()

2005-03-31 Thread Alex LIU
Thanks a lot for your detailed explanation and now I'm more clear... I'm using RedHat9.0. Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J. Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 9:05 PM To: 'Linux Newbie' Subject: RE: Syscall() vs

Re: Syscall() vs _syscallN()

2005-03-30 Thread Manish Regmi
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:38:09 +0800, Alex LIU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry for my unclear words... > I want to know the DIFFERENCE between SYSCALL() and _SYSCALLN()... > _syscallN() ( _syscall0(),_syscall1(),_syscall6() ) is a macro defined > in include/asm/unist.h while syscall() is a gli

RE: Syscall() vs _syscallN()

2005-03-30 Thread J.
ehalf Of J. > Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 5:36 PM > To: Linux Newbie > Subject: Re: Syscall() vs _syscallN() > > > On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Alex LIU wrote: > > > Hi: > > > > With either of syscall() or _syscallN() we can define a system call in > > the use

RE: Syscall() vs _syscallN()

2005-03-29 Thread Alex LIU
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J. Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 5:36 PM To: Linux Newbie Subject: Re: Syscall() vs _syscallN() On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Alex LIU wrote: > Hi: > > With either of syscall() or _syscallN() we can define a system call in &g

Re: Syscall() vs _syscallN()

2005-03-29 Thread J.
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Alex LIU wrote: > Hi: > > With either of syscall() or _syscallN() we can define a system call in the > user space program.I think they do the same work.What's the difference > between them? Thanks! > > Alex This is described in the manual page for syscalss ~: man syscall