Originally to: All
Hi,
once more on this subject before closing it.
Peter said:
>>I made that switch with RH7.1 some time ago with no problems.
>>7.1 runs on XFree86-4.0.3-5 and and 7.3 om XFree-4.2.0-8.
Ray Olszewski said:
> This move by Red Hat may be optimistic. Even Debian unstable (Sid)
Hi,
once more on this subject before closing it.
Peter said:
>>I made that switch with RH7.1 some time ago with no problems.
>>7.1 runs on XFree86-4.0.3-5 and and 7.3 om XFree-4.2.0-8.
Ray Olszewski said:
> This move by Red Hat may be optimistic. Even Debian unstable (Sid)
> still runs XFree86
Hi Peter.
>> I made that switch with RH7.1 some time ago with no problems.
>> 7.1 runs on XFree86-4.0.3-5 and 7.3 on XFree-4.2.0-8.
> This move by Red Hat may be optimistic. Even Debian unstable (Sid)
> still runs XFree86 4.1.0-17.
That is certainly possible. What version does RH 7.2 use?
XFre
At 11:25 AM 8/11/02 +0800, Peter wrote:
>[...]
>I made that switch with RH7.1 some time ago with no problems.
>7.1 runs on XFree86-4.0.3-5 and and 7.3 om XFree-4.2.0-8.
This move by Red Hat may be optimistic. Even Debian unstable (Sid) still
runs XFree86 4.1.0-17.
>It is there
>/etc/X11/XF86Con
In-Reply-To: Message from Ray Olszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
of "Fri, 09 Aug 2002 23:59:11 MST."
<5.1.0.14.1.20020809234007.0208bd20@celine>
Thanks!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> The one characteristic I see as common to the three problem apps, but
> absent in the OK apps, is speed and frequency
Responding only to "my" portion of this message -- I'll leave the libraries
part for Riley.
At 02:23 PM 8/10/02 +0800, Peter wrote:
>Thanks Riley and Ray!
[...]
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > You will find that the glibc library is common to every program on
> > your system
>
>There is no glibc o
Thanks Riley and Ray!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Basically, to locate the actual problem, we need to confirm the
> precice differences between a working configuration and one that
> isn't. Also, where there are two or more programs that can be
> identified as causing a specific problem in one co
See below.
At 09:02 AM 8/9/02 +0100, Riley Williams wrote:
>[...]
> > So the problem does not semm to be with the particular programs it
> > must be most likely within the kernel of RH7.3.
>
>There are several possible areas where the problem could be...
>
> 1. In the kernel itself, as you state
Hi Peter.
>>> When I recently upgraded to RH7.3 I got total keyboard locks when
>>> trying to run xscreensaver, tuxracer and chromium and may be others,
>>> necessitating dirty reboot by the reset botton. >
>>>
>>> I, therefore, conclude that the problem is somewhere whithin with
>>> RH7.3 and po
Thanks Riley
pfheiss@philonline said:
>.
> When I recently upgraded to RH7.3 I got total keyboard locks when
> trying to run xscreensaver, tuxracer and chromium and may be others,
> necessitating dirty reboot by the reset botton. >
>.
> I, therefore, conclude that the problem is somewher
10 matches
Mail list logo