RE: Translating IP tables

2005-02-01 Thread Ray Olszewski
At 06:54 PM 2/1/2005 -0500, Eve Atley wrote: [skipping a lot] 2. I flushed the nasty port 23 away from the iptables, and attempted to add 5901 using the following command: iptables -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -p tcp --destination-port 5901 -j ACCEPT 3. Now 'iptables -nvL' gi

RE: Translating IP tables

2005-02-01 Thread Eve Atley
Thanks, Ray, for your info so far. Here's what I've discerned... 1. Netstat does show 5901 is running (with much snipped)... Active Internet connections (only servers) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:58010.0.0.0:*

Re: Translating IP tables

2005-02-01 Thread Ray Olszewski
At 11:48 AM 2/1/2005 -0500, Eve Atley wrote: I'm wanting to set up to allow port 23 to be accepted via the internet in my Linux box running RedHat Linux Enterprise Workstation. I did some research and have an output pasted below; am I truly allowing input/output from the internet? What I truly am

(Addendum) Translating IP tables

2005-02-01 Thread Eve Atley
Based on someone's advice, I wanted to indicate I used the following command to get the iptables info: /sbin/iptables -L The command 'iptables -n -L' gives me the following: Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination RH-Firewall-1-INPUT all -- 0.

Translating IP tables

2005-02-01 Thread Eve Atley
I'm wanting to set up to allow port 23 to be accepted via the internet in my Linux box running RedHat Linux Enterprise Workstation. I did some research and have an output pasted below; am I truly allowing input/output from the internet? What I truly am attempting to do is telnet to port 5201 in o