At 08:11 PM 12/10/02 -0500, Haines Brown wrote:
[...]
Here is the result of my telnet experiment:
# telnet localhost 25
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to hartford-hwp.com (127.0.0.1).
Escape character is '^]'.
220 hartford-hwp.com ESMTP Sendmail 8.12.5/8.12.5; Tue, 10 Dec 2002
17:52:23 -0500
HELO
Ray,
>The first messages was an undeliverable notive from when I tried to
>send myself a test message almost a week ago:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Deferred: hartford-hwp.com.: Network is
> unreachable
Hard to say at this point. The message should have been deliverable
to my current (RH7.3 machine)
Comments below, interspersed.
At 02:43 PM 12/10/02 -0500, Haines Brown wrote:
Here are some preliminary results on fetchmail.
--
When I originally ran netsat -l, I got:
Active Internet connections (only servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
Here are some preliminary results on fetchmail.
--
When I originally ran netsat -l, I got:
Active Internet connections (only servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:smtp *:* LISTEN
But
OK. From what you posted ... specifically the "netstat -l" output ... we
know that *something* is listening on port 25. Specifically:
tcp0 0
127.0.0.1:smtp *:* LISTEN
Next step is to find out what that something is. There are several ways to
do
Haines,
I didn't catch the early posts on this topic but did see ray's about looking into
sendmail
and fetchmail config so here comes my "sendmail 101" class.
The netstat command is showing sendmail (smtp) listening on 127.0.0.1 (this is local
to the
machine, the loopback address.)
I normally
On a RH8.0 installation I've been trying to get going since October,
one problem has been that I can't receive e-mail. The first problem
was a broken rp-pppoe. When that fixed, I could at least browse the
web. Next I faced messed up rules for iptables, but I've removed the
firewall. Since the probl
