Re: permission for alias file

2003-01-07 Thread Haines Brown
> If I understand you correctly here, the "mail" directory is owned by > root/root and has a 755 permission, while the *.aliases files it > contains have 777 permissions. No good. Still get the permission error. Thanks for trying. Haines - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscri

Re: permission for alias file

2003-01-07 Thread Haines Brown
Carl, Aha, that may be it! I simply migrated the aliases directory and files up to the upgraded environment without worrying about their ownership and permissions. > I spoke to my mate and we put his lists in a dir /etc/mail/lists with owner and >group of root > and permissions of 755 and the f

Re: permission for alias file

2003-01-07 Thread Carl
At 10:31 07/01/2003 -0500, Haines Brown wrote: >> I remember doing an :include: statement for a mate and we found that >> 777 permissions on the file were OK but the directory must be set >> correctly. I seem to remember it couldn't have root ownership. >> >> Check the sendmail faq at: >> http://w

Re: permission for alias file

2003-01-07 Thread Haines Brown
> I remember doing an :include: statement for a mate and we found that > 777 permissions on the file were OK but the directory must be set > correctly. I seem to remember it couldn't have root ownership. > > Check the sendmail faq at: > http://www.sendmail.org/faq/section3.html#3.33 Thanks, Carl.

Re: permission for alias file

2003-01-07 Thread Jude DaShiell
redhat 8.0 has much more conservative security settings out of the box than previous versions of redhat had. Reason is too many hackers had too much success knocking over systems that used those earlier versions. My system was one of those casualties when I had redhat 7.2 running. -- Jude - T

Re: permission for alias file

2003-01-07 Thread Carl
>> >> >>For example, in /etc/aliases, I have a pointer to >> >>test: :include:/home/brownh/aliases/test.aliases >> >>But when I use it (after upgrading to RH 8.0), I get: >> >> - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - >> :include:/home/brownh/aliases/test.aliases >>

Re: permission for alias file

2003-01-06 Thread Haines Brown
> check to produce, but you might want to check the possibility anyway. Try > mode 644, instead of the 777 you say you are using, and see if that helps. Unfortuntely, it didn't help (test.aliases is now rw_r__r__, which is about what I started out with). > It is also possible that you have your

Re: permission for alias file

2003-01-06 Thread Ray Olszewski
Haines -- You might try setting *more* restrictive permissions on the aliases file. I don't recall which MTA RH 8.0 uses (sendmail? exim?), but alias-expansion code in MTAs often checks to make sure a specified alias file can be edited ONLY by its owner, as a security measure to avoid problems

permission for alias file

2003-01-06 Thread Haines Brown
When I use /etc/aliases for single address, it works ok (as I'm now doing), but if there is a pointer to a file of addresses, it fails because of permisions. For example, in /etc/aliases, I have a pointer to test: :include:/home/brownh/aliases/test.aliases But when I use it (after upgradin