Re: process priority at 25

2002-05-20 Thread Axel H. Siebenwirth
Hi Tom! On Mon, 20 May 2002, Tom Beer wrote: > amanda, some month ago. I thought that the uneven numbers are experimental, but > the even numbers would be "stable"? For example in kernel version number 2.4.18 2 is the VERSION

Re: process priority at 25

2002-05-20 Thread Richard Adams
On Sunday 19 May 2002 22:29, Tom Beer wrote: > Hi, > Kernel 2.4.18 won't run on my off-the-shelf athlon-asus motherboard > configuration. Mounting of disks during startup leads to seg faults. > 2.4.4 runs with small amounts of seg. faults, caused by an installation of > amanda, some month ago. I

Re: process priority at 25

2002-05-19 Thread Tom Beer
Hi, > > Is there perhaps something wrong? > > First thing i would do is try a "proven" kernel, 2.5.x i belive is development > but there again considering the 2.5 kernel series of development is at kernel > 2.5.11 i presume you mean 2.4.16.? > Kernel 2.4.18 won't run on my off-the-shelf athlon-a

Re: process priority at 25

2002-05-19 Thread Richard Adams
On Sunday 19 May 2002 19:17, you wrote: > Hi Richard! > > On Sun, 19 May 2002, Richard Adams wrote: > > First thing i would do is try a "proven" kernel, 2.5.x i belive is > > development but there again considering the 2.5 kernel series of > > development is at kernel 2.5.11 i presume you mean 2.4

Re: process priority at 25

2002-05-19 Thread Axel H. Siebenwirth
Hi Richard! On Sun, 19 May 2002, Richard Adams wrote: > First thing i would do is try a "proven" kernel, 2.5.x i belive is development > but there again considering the 2.5 kernel series of development is at kernel > 2.5.11 i presume you mean 2.4.16.? It really is 2.5.16 and that is where 2.5

Re: process priority at 25

2002-05-19 Thread Steven Smith
> I alway thought process priorities range from -20 to 19 (also according to > "man nice"). But under kernel 2.5.16 I run top and process is display with > priority 25.. A process's nice value is not the same thing as its priority. niceness is used in the calculation of priority, but they're not b

Re: process priority at 25

2002-05-19 Thread Richard Adams
On Sunday 19 May 2002 14:29, Axel H. Siebenwirth wrote: > Hi, > > I alway thought process priorities range from -20 to 19 (also according to > "man nice"). But under kernel 2.5.16 I run top and process is display with > priority 25.. > > Is there perhaps something wrong? First thing i would do is

process priority at 25

2002-05-19 Thread Axel H. Siebenwirth
Hi, I alway thought process priorities range from -20 to 19 (also according to "man nice"). But under kernel 2.5.16 I run top and process is display with priority 25.. Is there perhaps something wrong? Thank you, Axel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in