On 27.03.19 17:13, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 26-03-19 17:20:41, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 1:04 AM Michal Hocko wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon 25-03-19 13:03:47, Dan Williams wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 3:20 AM Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> [...]
>> User-defined memory namespa
On Thu 28-03-19 14:38:15, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 27.03.19 17:13, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > People are asking for a smaller memory hotplug granularity for other
> > usecases (e.g. memory ballooning into VMs) which are quite dubious to
> > be honest and not really worth all the code rework
On 2019-03-18 11:48:28 [+], Liu, Yongxin wrote:
>
> >
> > Bummer. That would dead lock indeed.
> > Is it easily possible to recognize the recursive case?
>
> Not easily. I don't have test case for recursive call.
> For now, just code analysis.
So I've been playing with qemu's nvdimm device
Add to security.sh to test load-keys for user keys.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang
---
test/security.sh | 56 ++
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test/security.sh b/test/security.sh
index 1b7a9a1a..7bd60293 100755
---
The syntax for loading user master key is different than loading a trusted
key. Fix so we can load user key properly.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang
---
ndctl/load-keys.c | 13 +
ndctl/util/keys.c | 20 +++-
ndctl/util/keys.h | 10 --
3 files changed, 28 inse
load-keys incorrectly assumes that all keys have TPM handles. TPM handle is
only for trusted-keys. Fix in order to allow user master-key work.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang
---
ndctl/load-keys.c |6 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ndctl/load-keys.c b/ndctl/lo
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 12:07 PM Dave Jiang wrote:
>
> load-keys incorrectly assumes that all keys have TPM handles. TPM handle is
> only for trusted-keys. Fix in order to allow user master-key work.
s/work/to operate/ ?
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang
> ---
> ndctl/load-keys.c |6 ++
>
On 3/28/19 12:11 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 12:07 PM Dave Jiang wrote:
>>
>> load-keys incorrectly assumes that all keys have TPM handles. TPM handle is
>> only for trusted-keys. Fix in order to allow user master-key work.
>
> s/work/to operate/ ?
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 12:07 PM Dave Jiang wrote:
>
> The syntax for loading user master key is different than loading a trusted
> key. Fix so we can load user key properly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang
> ---
> ndctl/load-keys.c | 13 +
> ndctl/util/keys.c | 20 +++-
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 12:17 PM Dave Jiang wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/28/19 12:11 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 12:07 PM Dave Jiang wrote:
> >>
> >> load-keys incorrectly assumes that all keys have TPM handles. TPM handle is
> >> only for trusted-keys. Fix in order to allow user m
On 3/28/19 12:18 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 12:07 PM Dave Jiang wrote:
>>
>> The syntax for loading user master key is different than loading a trusted
>> key. Fix so we can load user key properly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang
>> ---
>> ndctl/load-keys.c | 13 +
On 22.03.19 17:57, Dan Williams wrote:
> Changes since v4 [1]:
> - Given v4 was from March of 2017 the bulk of the changes result from
> rebasing the patch set from a v4.11-rc2 baseline to v5.1-rc1.
>
> - A unit test is added to ndctl to exercise the creation and dax
> mounting of multiple ind
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 1:10 PM David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
> On 22.03.19 17:57, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Changes since v4 [1]:
> > - Given v4 was from March of 2017 the bulk of the changes result from
> > rebasing the patch set from a v4.11-rc2 baseline to v5.1-rc1.
> >
> > - A unit test is added
>> You are using the term "Sub-section memory hotplug support", but is it
>> actually what you mean? To rephrase, aren't we talking here about
>> "Sub-section device memory hotplug support" or similar?
>
> Specifically it is support for passing @start and @size arguments to
> arch_add_memory() tha
On Thu, 2019-03-28 at 12:07 -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
> Add to security.sh to test load-keys for user keys.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang
> ---
> test/security.sh | 56
> ++
> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 2:17 PM David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
> >> You are using the term "Sub-section memory hotplug support", but is it
> >> actually what you mean? To rephrase, aren't we talking here about
> >> "Sub-section device memory hotplug support" or similar?
> >
> > Specifically it is supp
Reason I am asking is because I wonder how that would interact with the
memory block device infrastructure and hotplugging of system ram -
add_memory()/add_memory_resource(). I *assume* you are not changing the
add_memory() interface, so that one still only works with whole sect
load-keys incorrectly assumes that all keys have TPM handles. TPM handle is
only for trusted-keys. Fix in order to allow user master-key to operate.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang
---
v2:
- Make output go to stderr. (Dan)
ndctl/load-keys.c |6 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletion
The syntax for loading user master key is different than loading a trusted
key. Fix so we can load user key properly.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang
---
v2: No change
ndctl/load-keys.c | 13 +
ndctl/util/keys.c | 20 +++-
ndctl/util/keys.h | 10 --
3 files
Add to security.sh to test load-keys for user keys.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang
---
V2:
- Add quotes around $masterkey. (Vishal)
- Change fail to failed in output. (Vishal)
test/security.sh | 68 --
1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 7 deletio
转发邮件信息
发件人：mivczr...@exu.net
发送日期：2019-3-29 8:36:49
收件人：linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
~附~件~内~容~请~您~查~阅~
8:36:49
___
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
21 matches
Mail list logo
