RE: [PATCH v2 00/17] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework

> -Original Message- > From: Theodore Ts'o > > On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 01:52:15PM +0200, Knut Omang wrote: > > 1) Tests that exercises typically algorithmic or intricate, complex > >code with relatively few outside dependencies, or where the > dependencies > >are considered worth

RE: [PATCH v2 12/17] kunit: tool: add Python wrappers for running KUnit tests

Here is a bit of inline commentary on the TAP13/TAP14 discussion. > -Original Message- > From: Brendan Higgins > > > On 5/3/19 4:14 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote: > > >> On 5/2/19 10:36 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote: > > > In any case, it sounds like you and Greg are in agreement on the core > >

RE: [PATCH v2 16/17] kernel/sysctl-test: Add null pointer test for sysctl.c:proc_dointvec()

> -Original Message- > From: Greg KH > > On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 04:01:25PM -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote: > > From: Iurii Zaikin > > > > KUnit tests for initialized data behavior of proc_dointvec that is > > explicitly checked in the code. Includes basic parsing tests including > > in

RE: [Ksummit-discuss] [RFC PATCH 2/3] MAINTAINERS, Handbook: Subsystem Profile

> -Original Message- > From: Jani Nikula on Thursday, November 15, 2018 12:39 AM > > Cc: linux-doc > > On Wed, 14 Nov 2018, Dan Williams wrote: > > As presented at the 2018 Linux Plumbers conference [1], the Subsystem > > Profile is proposed as a way to reduce friction between commit