On Thu 25-04-19 13:57:25, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> > > I gave *vague* memories of running out of bits in the page flags if we
> > > changed this, but that was a while back. If that's no longer the case,
> > > then I'm open to changing the value, but I really don't want to expose
> > > it as a
> > I gave *vague* memories of running out of bits in the page flags if we
> > changed this, but that was a while back. If that's no longer the case,
> > then I'm open to changing the value, but I really don't want to expose
> > it as a Kconfig option as proposed in this patch. People won't have a
On Thu 25-04-19 16:31:38, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 05:25:50PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 23-04-19 16:38:43, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> > > sparsemem section size determines the maximum size and alignment that
> > > is allowed to offline/online memory block. The bigger
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 05:25:50PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 23-04-19 16:38:43, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> > sparsemem section size determines the maximum size and alignment that
> > is allowed to offline/online memory block. The bigger the size the less
> > the clutter in
On Tue 23-04-19 16:38:43, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> sparsemem section size determines the maximum size and alignment that
> is allowed to offline/online memory block. The bigger the size the less
> the clutter in /sys/devices/system/memory/*. On the other hand, however,
> there is less flexability
On 04/25/2019 01:18 AM, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 5:07 AM Anshuman Khandual
> wrote:
>>
>> On 04/24/2019 02:08 AM, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
>>> sparsemem section size determines the maximum size and alignment that
>>> is allowed to offline/online memory block. The bigger the
> This is yet another example of where we need to break down the section
> alignment requirement for arch_add_memory().
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/12633539.2015392.2477781120122237934.st...@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com/
Hi Dan,
Yes, that is exactly what I am trying to solve with
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 12:54 PM Pavel Tatashin
wrote:
>
> from original email
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 3:48 PM Pavel Tatashin
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 5:07 AM Anshuman Khandual
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 04/24/2019 02:08 AM, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> > > > sparsemem section
from original email
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 3:48 PM Pavel Tatashin
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 5:07 AM Anshuman Khandual
> wrote:
> >
> > On 04/24/2019 02:08 AM, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> > > sparsemem section size determines the maximum size and alignment that
> > > is allowed to
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 5:07 AM Anshuman Khandual
wrote:
>
> On 04/24/2019 02:08 AM, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> > sparsemem section size determines the maximum size and alignment that
> > is allowed to offline/online memory block. The bigger the size the less
> > the clutter in
On 04/24/2019 02:08 AM, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> sparsemem section size determines the maximum size and alignment that
> is allowed to offline/online memory block. The bigger the size the less
> the clutter in /sys/devices/system/memory/*. On the other hand, however,
> there is less flexability
sparsemem section size determines the maximum size and alignment that
is allowed to offline/online memory block. The bigger the size the less
the clutter in /sys/devices/system/memory/*. On the other hand, however,
there is less flexability in what granules of memory can be added and
removed.
12 matches
Mail list logo
