On Wed 16-11-16 14:32:48, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:05:05PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Wed 16-11-16 00:55:31, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 05:24:58AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > Every single user of vmf->virtual_address typed that entry
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:05:05PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 16-11-16 00:55:31, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 05:24:58AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > Every single user of vmf->virtual_address typed that entry to unsigned
> > > long before doing anything with it so the
On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 05:24:58AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> Every single user of vmf->virtual_address typed that entry to unsigned
> long before doing anything with it so the type of virtual_address does
> not really provide us any additional safety. Just use masked
> vmf->address which already
Every single user of vmf->virtual_address typed that entry to unsigned
long before doing anything with it so the type of virtual_address does
not really provide us any additional safety. Just use masked
vmf->address which already has the appropriate type.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara
On Wed 02-11-16 12:18:10, Hillf Danton wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 02, 2016 6:36 AM Jan Kara wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> > index 8e8b76d11bb4..2a4ebe3c67c6 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> > @@ -297,8 +297,6 @@ struct
On Wednesday, November 02, 2016 6:36 AM Jan Kara wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 8e8b76d11bb4..2a4ebe3c67c6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -297,8 +297,6 @@ struct vm_fault {
> gfp_t gfp_mask; /* gfp mask