On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 12:39 PM Jeff Moyer wrote:
>
> Dan Williams writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 6:16 AM Jeff Moyer wrote:
> >>
> >> Dan Williams writes:
> >>
> >> > Changes since v1 [1]:
> >> > * Include another patch make sure that function-number zero can be
> >> > safely used as
Dan Williams writes:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 6:16 AM Jeff Moyer wrote:
>>
>> Dan Williams writes:
>>
>> > Changes since v1 [1]:
>> > * Include another patch make sure that function-number zero can be
>> > safely used as an invalid function number (Jeff)
>> > * Add a comment clarifying why
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 6:16 AM Jeff Moyer wrote:
>
> Dan Williams writes:
>
> > Changes since v1 [1]:
> > * Include another patch make sure that function-number zero can be
> > safely used as an invalid function number (Jeff)
> > * Add a comment clarifying why zero is an invalid function
Dan Williams writes:
> Changes since v1 [1]:
> * Include another patch make sure that function-number zero can be
> safely used as an invalid function number (Jeff)
> * Add a comment clarifying why zero is an invalid function number (Jeff)
> * Pass nfit_mem to cmd_to_func() (Jeff)
> * Collect
Changes since v1 [1]:
* Include another patch make sure that function-number zero can be
safely used as an invalid function number (Jeff)
* Add a comment clarifying why zero is an invalid function number (Jeff)
* Pass nfit_mem to cmd_to_func() (Jeff)
* Collect a Tested-by from Sujith
[1]: