Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] acpi/nfit: Fix command-supported detection

2019-01-15 Thread Dan Williams
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 12:39 PM Jeff Moyer wrote: > > Dan Williams writes: > > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 6:16 AM Jeff Moyer wrote: > >> > >> Dan Williams writes: > >> > >> > Changes since v1 [1]: > >> > * Include another patch make sure that function-number zero can be > >> > safely used as

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] acpi/nfit: Fix command-supported detection

2019-01-15 Thread Jeff Moyer
Dan Williams writes: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 6:16 AM Jeff Moyer wrote: >> >> Dan Williams writes: >> >> > Changes since v1 [1]: >> > * Include another patch make sure that function-number zero can be >> > safely used as an invalid function number (Jeff) >> > * Add a comment clarifying why

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] acpi/nfit: Fix command-supported detection

2019-01-15 Thread Dan Williams
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 6:16 AM Jeff Moyer wrote: > > Dan Williams writes: > > > Changes since v1 [1]: > > * Include another patch make sure that function-number zero can be > > safely used as an invalid function number (Jeff) > > * Add a comment clarifying why zero is an invalid function

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] acpi/nfit: Fix command-supported detection

2019-01-15 Thread Jeff Moyer
Dan Williams writes: > Changes since v1 [1]: > * Include another patch make sure that function-number zero can be > safely used as an invalid function number (Jeff) > * Add a comment clarifying why zero is an invalid function number (Jeff) > * Pass nfit_mem to cmd_to_func() (Jeff) > * Collect

[PATCH v2 0/2] acpi/nfit: Fix command-supported detection

2019-01-14 Thread Dan Williams
Changes since v1 [1]: * Include another patch make sure that function-number zero can be safely used as an invalid function number (Jeff) * Add a comment clarifying why zero is an invalid function number (Jeff) * Pass nfit_mem to cmd_to_func() (Jeff) * Collect a Tested-by from Sujith [1]: