>
> >>
> >> This patch has no n/M in the subject line; but is included in a thread
> >> that also has a 0/2 cover letter, as well as 1/2 and 2/2 patches in
> >> separate mails. Is that intentional?
> >
> > Yes, kernel series has 0-2 patches and Qemu has this one. I thought its
> > good to ke
On 07/25/2018 12:01 AM, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
This patch has no n/M in the subject line; but is included in a thread
that also has a 0/2 cover letter, as well as 1/2 and 2/2 patches in
separate mails. Is that intentional?
Yes, kernel series has 0-2 patches and Qemu has this one. I thought its
Hi Eric,
>
> On 07/13/2018 02:52 AM, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> > This patch adds virtio-pmem Qemu device.
> >
> > This device presents memory address range information to guest
> > which is backed by file backend type. It acts like persistent
> > memory device for KVM guest. Guest can perf
> > > > > +
> > > > > +typedef struct VirtIOPMEMresp {
> > > > > +int ret;
> > > > > +} VirtIOPMEMResp;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +typedef struct VirtIODeviceRequest {
> > > > > +VirtQueueElement elem;
> > > > > +int fd;
> > > > > +VirtIOPMEM *pmem;
> > > > > +VirtIOPMEMResp resp;
> /*
> * virtio-balloon-pci: This extends VirtioPCIProxy.
> */
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-pmem.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-pmem.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00..08c96d7e80
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-pmem.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,241
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 15:58:20 +0200
David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 19.07.2018 14:16, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 01:48:13AM -0400, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> This patch adds virtio-pmem Qemu device.
>
> This device presents memory address range in
On 19.07.2018 14:16, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 01:48:13AM -0400, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
>>
>>>
This patch adds virtio-pmem Qemu device.
This device presents memory address range information to guest
which is backed by file backend type. It acts like persis
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 08:48:19 -0400
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > It will be necessary to define specific constants for virtio-pmem
> > instead of passing errno from the host to guest.
>
> Yes, defining your own constants work. But I think the only fsync()
> error that will make sense for the gues
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 13:16:35 +0100
Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 01:48:13AM -0400, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > This patch adds virtio-pmem Qemu device.
> > > >
> > > > This device presents memory address range information to guest
> > > > which is backed by
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 01:48:13 -0400 (EDT)
Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> >
> > > This patch adds virtio-pmem Qemu device.
> > >
> > > This device presents memory address range information to guest
> > > which is backed by file backend type. It acts like persistent
> > > memory device for KVM guest.
>
> > This patch adds virtio-pmem Qemu device.
> >
> > This device presents memory address range information to guest
> > which is backed by file backend type. It acts like persistent
> > memory device for KVM guest. Guest can perform read and persistent
> > write operations on this memory
11 matches
Mail list logo
