On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:49 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Dan Williams wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:26 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> >
>> > * Dan Williams wrote:
>> >
>> >> Ingo, Thomas, Al, any concerns with this series?
>> >
>> > Yeah, so:
>> >
>> >"[PATCH v3 0/9] Series short desc
* Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:26 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Dan Williams wrote:
> >
> >> Ingo, Thomas, Al, any concerns with this series?
> >
> > Yeah, so:
> >
> >"[PATCH v3 0/9] Series short description"
> >
> > ... isn't the catchiest of titles to capture my [a
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 8:52 AM Dan Williams
wrote:
> I think "happy" is a strong word when it comes to x86 machine check
> handling. My interpretation is that he and Andy acquiesced that this
> is about the best we can do with dax+mce as things stand today.
Yeah. I definitely wouldn't say "happ
> On May 14, 2018, at 8:52 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
>
>
> I think "happy" is a strong word when it comes to x86 machine check
> handling. My interpretation is that he and Andy acquiesced that this
> is about the best we can do with dax+mce as things stand today.
Agreed. I think it’s plausibl
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:26 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Dan Williams wrote:
>
>> Ingo, Thomas, Al, any concerns with this series?
>
> Yeah, so:
>
>"[PATCH v3 0/9] Series short description"
>
> ... isn't the catchiest of titles to capture my [all too easily distracted]
> attention! ;-)
My
* Dan Williams wrote:
> Ingo, Thomas, Al, any concerns with this series?
Yeah, so:
"[PATCH v3 0/9] Series short description"
... isn't the catchiest of titles to capture my [all too easily distracted]
attention! ;-)
I have marked it now for -tip processing. Linus was happy with this and
Ingo, Thomas, Al, any concerns with this series?
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 5:06 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> Changes since v2 [1]:
>
> * Fix source address increment in mcsafe_handle_tail() (Mika)
>
> * Extend the unit test to inject simulated write faults and validate
> that data is properly transfe