On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 01:38:59PM -0700, Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
> > Either way, it's not a kernel issue, how could you
> > blame 2.6.20 for gcc 4.3 issues when gcc 4.3 was not even released
> > when .20 was released? Are us kernel people time travellers?
>
> :-) good point. Everytime I switch to
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 07:47:07PM -0500, Stalin Kenny wrote:
> Felipe,
>
> Sorry to say but to say that one has to migrate to latest kernel in
> order to get community support is not rightthe statement does has
> a touch of arrogance. You are not the spokeperson for the community.
Um, yes he
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 08:43:40AM -0700, Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
>
> hello, again
>
> I think what we are trying to say is that some of us are working on
> debugging kernels that are meant to run "forever" and therefor it is
> a good thing to spent some time thinking about a kind of kernel
> rele
Felipe,
Sorry to say but to say that one has to migrate to latest kernel in
order to get community support is not rightthe statement does has
a touch of arrogance. You are not the spokeperson for the community.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Felipe Balbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
I hope we end this thread some day...
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 01:38:59PM -0700, Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
> Kernel developers should fix bugs in minor kernel versions as they are meant
> for this purpous and do major changes only in major version. A bunch of
> bugfixes I see (not only usb relat
Thanks for having your attention.
--- On Thu, 7/31/08, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: USB driver issue
> To: "Emanoil Kotsev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "SUBHRANIL CHOU
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 08:30:26AM -0700, Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
> I think everything is getting pretty messy recently - I was pretty
> satisfied with 2.6.20 and then tried 2.6.24. In fact I can not compile
> 2.6.20 right now because after an upgrade debian testing comes with
> gcc-4.3 that has a ba
Sorry I didn't make that clear.
This is against the TI bsp found here:
http://omapzoom.org/gf/project/omapkernel/frs/
When I forwarded the patch to my contact at TI, he suggested I also post it
here.
Thanks,
George
On Tuesday, July 29, 2008 03:44
Pandita, Vikram wrote:
> Hi Jaha
hello, again
I think what we are trying to say is that some of us are working on debugging
kernels that are meant to run "forever" and therefor it is a good thing to
spent some time thinking about a kind of kernel release in the 2.6 series that
can be considered as stable.
Besides what you s
Hello,
I don't want to argue if something is new or old. This depends on the point of
view, but I'm asking you to revise your considerations of what YOU label
as old and I agree with Anand, because this is also my point of view.
For my workstation that has dual core cpu and enough ram I can affo
Hi Koen:
> -Original Message-
> From: Koen Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 7:03 PM
> To: Syed Mohammed, Khasim
> Cc: Gadiyar, Anand; H?gander Jouni; Dirk Behme; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Kernel hang on OMAP3 based Beagle board, RTC issue?
>
>
Signed-off-by: Peter 'p2' De Schrijver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c | 60 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
index b41fe96..7e4f
This patchset add an early init function to initialize the voltage controller
and the off mode polarity before the drivers depending on these features are
enabled.
Peter 'p2' De Schrijver (2):
Move voltage controller configuration to pm34xx.c
Add early init for voltage controller configuratio
Signed-off-by: Peter 'p2' De Schrijver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c | 71 ++
1 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
index 8b6b09e..06eae7e 100644
Op 31 jul 2008, om 15:08 heeft Syed Mohammed, Khasim het volgende
geschreven:
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
index 202c269..308835b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
@@ -380,11 +380,11 @@ int __init omap
>
> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> > >> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> > >> index 202c269..308835b 100644
> > >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> > >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> > >> @@ -380,11 +380,11 @@ int __init omap3_pm_init(void)
> > >>goto e
Serial driver for OMAP Uart controllers
Signed-off-by: Girish S G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/arm/configs/omap_3430sdp_defconfig | 12
arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c| 166 ++---
drivers/serial/Kconfig | 23
drivers/serial/Makefile |1
drivers/s
Hi all,
With "no_hz=off" added to my bootargs, I get the following message every two
minutes
on my 3430SDP. Also seen on the beagleboard (with a different gpio number, I
think).
Has anyone seen this before? Any clues why this happens?
- Anand
(Sent the last mail without a subject. Sorry bout
Hi Tony,
This patch brings in serial driver for OMAP uart. This patch is taken from
earlier attempts of having serial driver specific for OMAP.
Tested on 3430. Any issues please report.
This Patch:
1. Adds support serial/debug uart
2. Fixes some of the bugs.
TODO:(These features will be added eve
Hi all,
With "no_hz=off" added to my bootargs, I get the following message every two
minutes
on my 3430SDP. Also seen on the beagleboard (with a different gpio number, I
think).
Has anyone seen this before? Any clues why this happens?
- Anand
<3>INFO: task twl4030 gpio:263 blocked for more th
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Syed Mohammed, Khasim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: arun c [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 5:11 PM
>> To: Syed Mohammed, Khasim
>> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: Does DSS support 24 b
21 matches
Mail list logo