Kevin,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Kevin Hilman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Premi, Sanjeev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 11:10 PM
>>> To: Premi, Sanjeev
>>> Cc: Peter Reid;
Hi,
Yes that patch will conflict because PM cleanup patch was only submitted to
l-o. I was trying to get the patches but it seems like cloning from http
protocol is giving me some trouble, I'll try to get them over git.
- omar
>From: Hiroshi DOYU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, Novemb
We accidentally saw this behavior when saving bootargs like:
"setenv bootargs='...'" instead of "setenv bootargs '...'"
Try removing '='
Misa
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-omap-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sudipta GHOSH
> Sent: Saturday, November 22,
Hi Felipe,
From: "ext Felipe Balbi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] omap mailbox: add initial omap3 support
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:57:47 +0200
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 02:28:36AM +0200, Hiroshi DOYU wrote:
> > @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
> > #define MAILBOX_IRQ_NEWMSG(u) (1 <
Hi,
This issue is more with busybox. Hope you will not mind for posting here.
In my development board, I use uboot as boot loader. busybox files are in flash.
when I boot , I can see the boot logo (peguin) in the lcd display and
all "printk" output.
But I am unable to see the busybox in the lcd
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008, David Brownell wrote:
> On Friday 21 November 2008, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > This oops shows up shortly after logging in on BeagleBoard running
> > pm-20081119; posting here in case anyone recognizes what's going on.
> > / is on a SanDisk SD Plus 4GB MMC card.
>
> Just for t
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 02:28:36AM +0200, Hiroshi DOYU wrote:
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
> #define MAILBOX_IRQ_NEWMSG(u)(1 << (2 * (u)))
> #define MAILBOX_IRQ_NOTFULL(u) (1 << (2 * (u) + 1))
>
> -static unsigned long mbox_base;
> +static void __iomem *mbox_base;
ohh. you
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 02:28:35AM +0200, Hiroshi DOYU wrote:
> +static unsigned long mbox_base;
shouldn't this be __void iomem *mbox_base ?
Then you would need a patch like this (not even compile tested):
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c
index 22546d0..
