Hello Sanjeev,
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Premi, Sanjeev wrote:
Here, I am proposing a common mechanism to identify the si revision; that
focuses
on the revision bits alone. (See code below)
The usage would then be (example):
if (omap_rev() OMAP3430_REV_ES1_0)
To
if
Hi Vikram,
I am going to post version-3 for these patches due to below updates/fixes:
PATCH 2/3: Add support for NAND on ZOOM2/LDP boards
1. prototype mismatch for 'unlock' funtion pointer in 'mach/nand.h and
in 'mtd_struct'
2. typo error (Singned - Signed) indicated by Kishore.
PATCH 3/3:
This patch series adds flash support for NAND (in sdp, zoom2 and ldp),
OneNAND and NOR (in sdp)
Tested on Zoom2 by Vikram, On SDP by Vimal
OMAP: Zoom2: Enable NAND and JFFS2 in defconfig
OMAP2/3: Add support for flash on SDP boards
OMAP3: Add support for NAND on ZOOM2/LDP boards
From: Vimal Singh vimalsi...@ti.com
Add support for flash on SDP boards. NAND, NOR and OneNAND
are supported.
Only tested on 3430SDP (ES2 and ES3.1), somebody please test on
2430SDP and check the chips select for 2430SDP.
Also note that:
For OneNAND: in the earlier 2430SDP code the kernel
From: Vimal Singh vimalsi...@ti.com
Adding NAND support for ZOOM2 and LDP board. I have tested it for ZOOM2
boards, someone can verify it for LDP, hopefully it should not have any
problem.
The size of the U-Boot environment partition was increased to 1.25MB.
Vikram: Changed ldp name to zoom.
Sorry I clicked on -send- button without $SUBJECT. Correcting this time.
-vimal
From: Vimal Singh vimalsi...@ti.com
Adding NAND support for ZOOM2 and LDP board. I have tested it for ZOOM2 boards,
someone can verify it for LDP, hopefully it should not have any problem.
The size of the U-Boot
From: Vimal Singh vimalsi...@ti.com
Enable NAND options by default in zoom2_defconfig file
Other changes in defconfig come from make menuconfig syncup
Signed-off-by: Vikram Pandita vikram.pand...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Vimal Singh vimalsi...@ti.com
---
arch/arm/configs/omap_zoom2_defconfig |
Hi Hiroshi,
-Original Message-
From: Hiroshi DOYU [mailto:hiroshi.d...@nokia.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 2:32 PM
To: C.A, Subramaniam
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; t...@atomide.com;
r...@arm.linux.org.uk; Kanigeri, Hari; Gupta, Ramesh
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10]
From: ext C.A, Subramaniam subramaniam...@ti.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH 10/10] omap mailbox: OMAP4 Mailbox-driver Patch to support
tasklet implementation
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:46:53 +0200
Hi Hiroshi,
-Original Message-
From: Hiroshi DOYU [mailto:hiroshi.d...@nokia.com]
I've been working with the linux-omap kernel, and after 2.6.31-rc5 I
started seeing some strange crashes. A back trace is given here:
[ 46.620941] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual
address 512a
[ 46.628295] pgd = c71f4000
[ 46.631042] [512a] *pgd=878a6031,
Currently, only GPIOs in the wakeup domain (GPIOs in bank 0) are
enabled as wakups. This patch also enables GPIOs in the PER
powerdomain (banks 2-6) to be used as possible wakeup sources.
In addition, this patch ensures that all GPIO wakeups can wakeup
the MPU using the PM_MPUGRPSEL_pwrdm
HU TAO-TGHK48 ta...@motorola.com writes:
Resend to linux-omap
-Original Message-
From: HU TAO-TGHK48
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 7:50 PM
To: 'vimal singh'; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; LKML;
linux-ser...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ye Yuan.Bo-A22116; Chen Xiaolong-A21785
Subject: RE:
Cliff Brake cliff.br...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Mike Rapoportm...@compulab.co.il wrote:
3) If I'm not much mistaken, board specific pin mux configuration has to deal
with arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/mux.h and arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux.c. For
instance, if my board
Hi Adrian,
[PATCH V3 0/30] mmc and omap_hsmmc patches
What is the reason for V3? What is the difference between V2 and V3 series?
Regards,
Madhu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net writes:
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 04:14:28PM +0530, Premi, Sanjeev wrote:
Hi,
Currently there are multiple mechanisms for identifying the si revisions.
Most places the comparison is against omap_rev() as a whole number. Example:
Sanjeev Premi pr...@ti.com writes:
When 'enable_off_mode' is 0, the target power state for MPU
and Core is locally changed to PWRDM_POWER_RET but, the
statistics are updated for idle state originally selected
by the governor.
This patch 'invalidates' the idle states that lead either of
MPU
Premi, Sanjeev pr...@ti.com writes:
Hi all,
There is no generic function to translate an OPP to FREQ and vice versa.
Came across the problem while trying to submit a follow-up to earlier
patch for change in mpurate via bootargs.
The function get_opp in resource34xx.c, but it is always
-Original Message-
From: Tomi Valkeinen [mailto:tomi.valkei...@nokia.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 4:30 PM
To: ext Andrew Morton
Cc: Artem Bityutskiy; t...@atomide.com; Hiremath, Vaibhav; Syed
Mohammed, Khasim; sako...@gmail.com; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
Is there anyway on OMAP systems (or in general in embedded systems) to
know a way in which the processor was reset, after the reset.
I am using a system based on OMAP5912 OSK and its getting reset for no
known reason.
Thanks in advance,
Suresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Suresh Rajashekara wrote:
Is there anyway on OMAP systems (or in general in embedded systems) to
know a way in which the processor was reset, after the reset.
I am using a system based on OMAP5912 OSK and its getting reset for no
known reason.
Not sure about the OMAP5912, but at least on
Not sure about the OMAP5912, but at least on the OMAP3430, there
is a register (PRM_RSTST) that can logs the global reset sources.
Reading this register after the reset should tell you the cause of
the last reset.
Maybe there is something similar in the OMAP5912.
You can look at the
On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:00:03 +0300
Adrian Hunter adrian.hun...@nokia.com wrote:
From baf6574a1b5e7c4fdc4a66d9e038efeee75ea1a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Adrian Hunter adrian.hun...@nokia.com
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 19:27:36 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] omap_hsmmc: ensure all clock enables and
Kevin Hilman wrote:
Mike Chan m...@android.com writes:
Need to lock the res_mutex when traversing the res_list.
Signed-off-by: Mike Chan m...@android.com
Looks good, thanks.
This patch causes a hang for me when transitioning to OFF mode. This
was tested on the Android 2.6.29 tree and is
23 matches
Mail list logo
