On Fri, 2010-01-01 at 11:08 +0800, Américo Wang wrote:
> This patch looks fine for me, except that I don't think it's necessary
> to introduce an inline function for that...
Actually, I really think we do. The whole reason we got into this mess
in the first place is that it wasn't obvious from th
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 4:20 AM, Vimal Singh wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 3:17 AM, Steve Sakoman wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Steve Sakoman wrote:
>>
>>> I can confirm that this issue exists on Overo too. Sadly, switching
>>> to 16 bit reads does not fix the issue for me. I'
