Rafael J. Wysocki had written, on 10/12/2010 06:25 PM, the following:
On Tuesday, October 12, 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, October 11, 2010, Nishanth Menon wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki had written, on 10/09/2010 05:59 PM, the following:
[...]
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon
OK
Your e
On Tuesday, October 12, 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, October 11, 2010, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > Rafael J. Wysocki had written, on 10/09/2010 05:59 PM, the following:
> > [...]
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon
> > >
> > > OK
> > >
> > > Your error messages are a bit inc
* Carlos Chinea [101011 01:58]:
> Introduces the OMAP SSI driver in the kernel.
>
> The Synchronous Serial Interface (SSI) is a legacy version
> of HSI. As in the case of HSI, it is mainly used to connect
> Application engines (APE) with cellular modem engines (CMT)
> in cellular handsets.
>
> I
* Stephan Linz [101012 12:11]:
> Am Montag, 11. Oktober 2010, um 20:40:51 schrieb Ashwin Bihari:
> > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Tim Nordell
> wrote:
> > > On 10/11/10 12:30, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > >> Uhh, so whose patches are these originally?
> > >>
> > >> We have them now queued with
* Felipe Contreras [101012 03:52]:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >> Would be nice to get the dspbridge into working shape. Sounds we still
> >> need the following:
> >>
> >> - memblock fixes
> >> - this series to fix the c
Hi Linus,
Please pull a one-liner from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-2.6.git
omap-fixes-for-linus
Regards,
Tony
The following changes since commit cb655d0f3d57c23db51b981648e452988c0223f9:
Linux 2.6.36-rc7 (2010-10-06 13:39:52 -0700)
are available in th
* Jarkko Nikula [101012 06:42]:
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:29:48 +0100
> Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 06:57:58PM +0530, Anand Gadiyar wrote:
> > > Commit 346a5c890 (OMAP: control: move plat-omap/control.h
> > > to mach-omap2/control.h) in the linux-omap tree removed
> > > plat/c
* Kevin Hilman [101012 11:30]:
> [adding linux-omap list]
>
> Vasiliy Kulikov writes:
>
> > "ret" is unsigned, so check for (ret < 0) made no sense.
> > Made it signed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kulikov
> > ---
> > I cannot compile this driver, so it is not tested.
>
> Acked-by: Kevin H
Am Montag, 11. Oktober 2010, um 20:40:51 schrieb Ashwin Bihari:
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Tim Nordell
wrote:
> > On 10/11/10 12:30, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >> Uhh, so whose patches are these originally?
> >>
> >> We have them now queued with Tim Nordell as the author. Please let me
> >>
[adding linux-omap list]
Vasiliy Kulikov writes:
> "ret" is unsigned, so check for (ret < 0) made no sense.
> Made it signed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kulikov
> ---
> I cannot compile this driver, so it is not tested.
Acked-by: Kevin Hilman
Since the original driver is being queued via th
"Cousson, Benoit" writes:
> Adding more folks to the discussion.
>
> On 10/12/2010 9:30 AM, Varadarajan, Charulatha wrote:
>>
>>> From: Cousson, Benoit
>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 12:45 PM
>>> To: Varadarajan, Charulatha
>>>
>>> Hi Charu,
>>>
>>> On 10/11/2010 2:02 PM, Varadarajan, Charul
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, Anand Gadiyar wrote:
> Commit 346a5c890 (OMAP: control: move plat-omap/control.h
> to mach-omap2/control.h) in the linux-omap tree removed
> plat/control.h and most of its callers. This one slipped
> through - breaking the build as below when
> CONFIG_SND_OMAP_SOC_MCPDM is def
> -Original Message-
> From: Felipe Contreras [mailto:felipe.contre...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 6:21 AM
> To: Guzman Lugo, Fernando
> Cc: gre...@suse.de; felipe.contre...@nokia.com;
> ameya.pala...@nokia.com; Menon, Nishanth;
> hiroshi.d...@nokia.com; o...@wizery.c
> -Original Message-
> From: Felipe Contreras [mailto:felipe.contre...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 6:09 AM
> To: Guzman Lugo, Fernando
> Cc: hiroshi.d...@nokia.com; david.co...@nokia.com;
> felipe.contre...@nokia.com; ameya.pala...@nokia.com;
> linux-ker...@vger.kerne
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:29:48 +0100
Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 06:57:58PM +0530, Anand Gadiyar wrote:
> > Commit 346a5c890 (OMAP: control: move plat-omap/control.h
> > to mach-omap2/control.h) in the linux-omap tree removed
> > plat/control.h and most of its callers. This one slip
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 06:57:58PM +0530, Anand Gadiyar wrote:
> Commit 346a5c890 (OMAP: control: move plat-omap/control.h
> to mach-omap2/control.h) in the linux-omap tree removed
> plat/control.h and most of its callers. This one slipped
> through - breaking the build as below when
> CONFIG_SND_O
Commit 346a5c890 (OMAP: control: move plat-omap/control.h
to mach-omap2/control.h) in the linux-omap tree removed
plat/control.h and most of its callers. This one slipped
through - breaking the build as below when
CONFIG_SND_OMAP_SOC_MCPDM is defined. Fix this.
CC sound/soc/omap/omap-mcpdm.
Adding more folks to the discussion.
On 10/12/2010 9:30 AM, Varadarajan, Charulatha wrote:
From: Cousson, Benoit
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 12:45 PM
To: Varadarajan, Charulatha
Hi Charu,
On 10/11/2010 2:02 PM, Varadarajan, Charulatha wrote:
Fix the below warning during boot
[0.000
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 05:16:10AM -0500, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
The comments of this post also apply to IGEP v2 board (thanks Laurent)
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg36402.html
Changes are:
- Set onenand_setup to NULL instead of adding a no-op function.
-
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Guzman Lugo, Fernando
wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Fernando Guzman Lugo
>> wrote:
>> > This set of patches remove the dspbridge custom mmu
>> implementation and
>> > use iommu module instead.
>>
>> I have tried this, it works for simple tests, but no
On 10/12/2010 11:35 AM, Basak, Partha wrote:
From: Cousson, Benoit
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 1:32 PM
To: Basak, Partha
Cc: DebBarma, Tarun Kanti; Kevin Hilman; G, Manjunath
Kondaiah; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Shilimkar, Santosh;
Paul Walmsley; Tony Lindgren
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 8/17] d
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Guzman Lugo, Fernando
wrote:
>> > @@ -420,7 +431,8 @@ static void sgtable_fill_kmalloc(struct
>> sg_table
>> > *sgt, u32 pa, size_t len)
>> > for_each_sg(sgt->sgl, sg, sgt->nents, i) {
>> > size_t bytes;
>> >
>> > - bytes = iopgs
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> Would be nice to get the dspbridge into working shape. Sounds we still
>> need the following:
>>
>> - memblock fixes
>> - this series to fix the control module related issues
>> - platform data fo
The comments of this post also apply to IGEP v2 board (thanks Laurent)
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg36402.html
Changes are:
- Set onenand_setup to NULL instead of adding a no-op function.
- On igep2_flash_init() function:
- Use 'for' loop instead 'while' lo
ping..
On Friday 08 October 2010 11:50 AM, Varadarajan, Charulatha wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Peter Ujfalusi [mailto:peter.ujfal...@nokia.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 12:47 PM
To: Varadarajan, Charulatha
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; alsa-de...@alsa-project.org; Kamat
> -Original Message-
> From: Cousson, Benoit
> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 1:32 PM
> To: Basak, Partha
> Cc: DebBarma, Tarun Kanti; Kevin Hilman; G, Manjunath
> Kondaiah; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Shilimkar, Santosh;
> Paul Walmsley; Tony Lindgren
> Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 8/17] d
On 10/12/2010 9:22 AM, Basak, Partha wrote:
From: DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 11:19 AM
To: Cousson, Benoit
Benoit,
From: Cousson, Benoit
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 4:42 AM
To: DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
Hi Tarun,
On 10/9/2010 5:40 PM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> Define the following architecture specific funtions for omap2/3/4
> .pwrdm_set_next_pwrst
> .pwrdm_read_next_pwrst
> .pwrdm_read_pwrst
> .pwrdm_read_prev_pwrst
>
> Convert the platform-independent framework to call these functions.
>
> Signed-off-by:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> Put infrastructure in place, so arch specific func pointers
> can be hooked up to the platform-independent part of the
> framework.
Hmm. So if simply patches 1 and 2 of 8 are applied, I guess the system
will panic on boot, now? We should avoid that
Hi Rajendra,
some brief comments -
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> This is in preparation of splitting the powerdomain framework into
> platform-independent part (for all omaps) and platform-specific
> parts.
> The platform-independent code would reside in plat-omap/powerdomain.c
>
> -Original Message-
> From: DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 11:19 AM
> To: Cousson, Benoit
> Cc: Basak, Partha; Kevin Hilman; G, Manjunath Kondaiah;
> linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Shilimkar, Santosh; Paul
> Walmsley; Tony Lindgren
> Subject: RE: [PATCHv3 8/17]
31 matches
Mail list logo
