On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 21:08, tom.leim...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Ming Lei tom.leim...@gmail.com
This patch supports pmu irq routed from CTI, so
make pmu/perf working on OMAP4.
The idea is from Woodruff Richard in the disscussion
about Oprofile on Pandaboard / Omap4 on
Hi Rabin,
2011/5/14 Rabin Vincent ra...@rab.in:
What happened to this patch? It is neither in mainline nor in
linux-next.
This patch depends on the two with titles:
introduce cross trigger interface helpers
pmu: allow platform specific irq enable/disable handling
and the above
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 04:48:52PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
Hi Rabin,
2011/5/14 Rabin Vincent ra...@rab.in:
What happened to this patch? It is neither in mainline nor in
linux-next.
This patch depends on the two with titles:
introduce cross trigger interface helpers
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:27:57PM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote:
Adding support for the twl6025. Major difference in the twl6025 is the
group functionality has been removed from the chip so this affects how
regulators are enabled and disabled.
Acked-by: Mark Brown
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 07:40:32AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 04:41:32 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] omap: Remove support for omap2evm
The board support has never been merged for it as noticed
by Russell King li...@arm.linux.org.uk. So let's remove the
related dead code.
Hello,
I see a lot of great kernel work on the omaps.
I have a dm3730 with a DSP.
I am wondering if there is any work to make using the DSPs that are part
of some chips easier to use in some standard way such as /dev or MPI or
some other abstraction.
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Thursday 12 May 2011, Mike Rapoport wrote:
@@ -299,17 +299,14 @@ static struct omap2_hsmmc_info mmc[] = {
static struct gpio_led igep_gpio_leds[] = {
[0] = {
.name = gpio-led:red:d0,
- .gpio = IGEP2_GPIO_LED0_RED,
