Re: [GIT PULL] USB patches for next merge window

2011-05-22 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 02:42:44PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, > > forgot to Cc linux-omap. Sorry > > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 02:03:53PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi Tony, > > > > these patches are for 2.6.40 merge window. > > > > The following changes since commit 693d92a1bbc9e4

Re: [GIT PULL] USB Patches

2011-05-22 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 01:44:09PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > These are all supposed to go into -rc cycle but I guess we're already > too late for that (?). If so, let me know and I can add Cc: > sta...@kernel.org to all of those patches so they go to stable releases > too. > > The followin

Re: [PATCH V4] OMAP3+: SR Layer Cleanup

2011-05-22 Thread Gulati, Shweta
Benoit, On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote: > Hi Shweta, > > On 5/13/2011 8:27 AM, Gulati, Shweta wrote: >> >> To set sr ntarget values  for all volt_domain, >> volt_table is retrieved by doing a look_up of 'vdd_name' >> field from omap_hwmod but voltage domain pointer does no

Re: [PATCH] cleanup regulator supply definitions in mach-omap2 to use REGULATOR_SUPPLY

2011-05-22 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 06:49:26PM -0400, Oleg Drokin wrote: > If I end-up with a new version of the patch, what do you think would be best > as a divisor > between the patches? Just have ~half of changes split into another patch or > do you have any other ideas? Split the changes to not set .d

Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] USB: TWL6025 allow different regulator name

2011-05-22 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 09:21:24PM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote: > The twl6025 uses a different regulator for USB than the 6030 so select > the correct regulator name depending on the subclass of device. Acked-by: Mark Brown -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap"

Re: [PATCH] cleanup regulator supply definitions in mach-omap2 to use REGULATOR_SUPPLY

2011-05-22 Thread Oleg Drokin
Hello! On May 22, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > Note that it'd be better to split into two patches as it makes review > easier. If I end-up with a new version of the patch, what do you think would be best as a divisor between the patches? Just have ~half of changes split into another pa

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] REGULATOR: TWL6025: add support to twl-regulator

2011-05-22 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 09:21:23PM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote: > Adding support for the twl6025. Major difference in the twl6025 is the > group functionality has been removed from the chip so this affects how > regulators are enabled and disabled. Acked-by: Mark Brown > Since V1 > > Use the fe

Re: [PATCH] cleanup regulator supply definitions in mach-omap2 to use REGULATOR_SUPPLY

2011-05-22 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 05:58:49PM -0400, gr...@linuxhacker.ru wrote: > From: Oleg Drokin > > Also drop old style supply.dev assignments common in hsmmc init > as no longer needed. Acked-by: Mark Brown Note that it'd be better to split into two patches as it makes review easier. -- To unsubscr

[PATCH] cleanup regulator supply definitions in mach-omap2 to use REGULATOR_SUPPLY

2011-05-22 Thread green
From: Oleg Drokin Also drop old style supply.dev assignments common in hsmmc init as no longer needed. CC: Mark Brown CC: Mike Rapoport CC: Nishant Kamat CC: Steve Sakoman CC: Mikkel Christensen CC: Felipe Balbi CC: Santosh Shilimkar Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/bo

Re: [PATCH v10 4/7] MFD: TWL4030: power scripts for OMAP3 boards

2011-05-22 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Lesly, On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 07:10:03PM +0530, Manuel, Lesly Arackal wrote: > Hi Samuel, > > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > > Hi Lesly, > > > > On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 06:47:10PM +0530, Lesly A M wrote: > >> Power bus message sequence for TWL4030 to enter sleep/wake

[PATCH 1/3] Initial B&N Nook Color (encore) support.

2011-05-22 Thread green
From: Oleg Drokin Bare-bones board file, comes with serial console, gpio keys, MMC/SDCard and USB (peripheral) support. Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig |5 + arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile |2 + arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3en

Initial B&N Nook Color support, take four

2011-05-22 Thread green
Hello! Next attempt at B&N Nook Color board file submission. USB peripheral mode is fully operational as is serial console and MMC/SDCard. Changes since v3: Separated mach-types change into a separate patch (already got RMK approval) Dramatically cut number of includes in the board

[PATCH 2/3] Add tps65921 chip

2011-05-22 Thread green
From: Oleg Drokin Very similar to TPS65920 List of differences: http://www.ti.com/litv/pdf/swcu066b CC: sa...@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin --- drivers/mfd/twl-core.c |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c b/drivers/mfd/twl

[PATCH 3/3] Update Nook Color machine 3284 to common Encore name.

2011-05-22 Thread green
From: Oleg Drokin Nachine database already updated: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/machines/list.php?id=3284 Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin --- arch/arm/tools/mach-types |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/tools/mach-types b/arch/arm/tools/mach

Re: [RESEND][PATCH 4/5] arm: omap: usb: Runtime PM support

2011-05-22 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Felipe, On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 01:48:09PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 03:08:52PM +0530, Keshava Munegowda wrote: > > From: Keshava Munegowda > > > > The usbhs core driver does not enable/disable the intefrace and > > fucntional clocks; These clocks are handled by hwm

[PATCH v4 2/2] USB: TWL6025 allow different regulator name

2011-05-22 Thread Graeme Gregory
The twl6025 uses a different regulator for USB than the 6030 so select the correct regulator name depending on the subclass of device. Since V1 Use features passed via platform data instead of global variable. Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory --- drivers/usb/otg/twl6030-usb.c | 10 +- 1

[PATCH v4 1/2] REGULATOR: TWL6025: add support to twl-regulator

2011-05-22 Thread Graeme Gregory
Adding support for the twl6025. Major difference in the twl6025 is the group functionality has been removed from the chip so this affects how regulators are enabled and disabled. The names of the regulators also changed. The DCDCs of the 6025 are software controllable as well. Since V1 Use the

[PATCH v4 0/1] Add support for twl6025 PMIC

2011-05-22 Thread Graeme Gregory
This patch series starts to add support for the twl6025 chip to the twl driver. This series contains patches for the MFD device and the regulator device to support the twl6025. Since V3 Addressed some comments from Balaji T K, changed dcdc references to smps. And rebased on top of new upstream dr

Re: [PATCH v1] omap: usbhs: Fixed the crash during rmmod of ehci and ohci

2011-05-22 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Felipe, On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 01:53:15PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 02:24:58PM +0530, Keshava Munegowda wrote: > > From: Keshava Munegowda > > > > The disabling of clocks and freeing GPIO are changed > > to fix the occurrence of the crash of rmmod of ehci and ohci

Re: [PATCHv2] OMAP3: beagle: add support for beagleboard xM revision C

2011-05-22 Thread Igor Grinberg
Hi Koen, On 05/20/11 13:59, k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote: > From: Koen Kooi > > The USB enable GPIO has been inverted and the USER button moved. > > Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi > --- > > Changes since v1: > Fixed more xM references > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c | 32

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] OMAP3BEAGLE: Add support for mt9p031 sensor driver.

2011-05-22 Thread Igor Grinberg
Hi Javier, linux-omap should be CC'ed - added. In addition to Koen's comments, some comments below. On 05/20/11 16:47, Javier Martin wrote: > isp.h file has to be included as a temporal measure > since clocks of the isp are not exposed yet. > > Signed-off-by: Javier Martin > --- > arch/arm/

Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: twl6030: do not write to _GRP for regulator enable

2011-05-22 Thread Liam Girdwood
On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 14:50 +0800, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 07:03:51PM +0530, Balaji T K wrote: > > TWL6030: regulator is enabled via VREG_STATE > > TWL4030: regulator is enabled via VREG_GRP > > Since there is nothing common, split twlreg_enable similar to other > > regulator_o

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] REGULATOR: TWL6025: add support to twl-regulator

2011-05-22 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 07:32:49PM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote: > Adding support for the twl6025. Major difference in the twl6025 is the > group functionality has been removed from the chip so this affects how > regulators are enabled and disabled. > > The names of the regulators also changed. I