Hi everyone,
Does anybody knows about n810 integration status on Kernel?
I have one n810, and I try to update the newest kernel and filesystem image
freely.
And, if anyone know about , please let me know.
The information which I know is just the flasher from Nokia is needed for
updating.
And,
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:14:03AM -0500, Moiz Sonasath wrote:
...
+ if (enabled)
+ twl-vbus_enable = 1;
+ else
+ twl-vbus_enable = 0;
+
Suggest twl-vbus_enable = enabled;
/*
* Start driving VBUS. Set OPA_MODE bit in CHARGERUSB_CTRL1
Op 24 jun 2011, om 18:23 heeft Sanjeev Premi het volgende geschreven:
The current selection of the GPTIMER on was result of
a hardware issue in early versions of the Beagleboards
(Ax and B1 thru B4). [1] [2]
Its been long since the hardware issue has been fixed.
This patch uses GPTIMER 1
On 6/24/2011 7:38 AM, jean.pi...@newoldbits.com wrote:
From: Jean Pihetj-pi...@ti.com
Since cpuidle is a CPU centric framework it decides the MPU
next power state based on the MPU exit_latency and target_residency
figures.
The rest of the power domains get their next power state programmed
Hi,
On Friday, June 24, 2011, Paul Walmsley wrote:
(Arve cc'ed, also adding Magnus and Kevin back to cc)
Thanks, my mailer is playing tricks on me. :-)
Hi Rafael,
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, June 23, 2011, Alan Stern wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Paul
-Original Message-
From: Hilman, Kevin
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2011 1:44 AM
To: Russell King - ARM Linux
Cc: Premi, Sanjeev; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org;
linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] omap2+: pm: cpufreq: Fix
loops_per_jiffy calculation
Russell
-Original Message-
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Koen Kooi
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2011 1:47 PM
To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org List
Cc: linux-arm-kernel; Paul Walmsley
Subject: Re: [PATCH] omap3: beagle: Use GPTIMERi
-Original Message-
From: Shilimkar, Santosh
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2011 12:18 AM
To: Russell King - ARM Linux
Cc: Premi, Sanjeev; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org;
linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; Hilman, Kevin
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] omap2+: pm: cpufreq: Fix
loops_per_jiffy
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Paul Walmsley wrote:
But suspend users don't know this either, since they can't predict when
the next external wakeup can happen.
But they do know (or should know) that they don't intend to use the
system in the near future. It might be good to have a separate
Op 25 jun 2011, om 20:51 heeft Premi, Sanjeev het volgende geschreven:
-Original Message-
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Koen Kooi
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2011 1:47 PM
To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org List
Cc:
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011, Premi, Sanjeev wrote:
[sp] I didn't include a reason - because the problem may not
be reproducible on the public trees.
During tests performed in internal development trees, the
BogoMIPS calculations @ 1GHz wouldn't go beyond 830-850
range. While
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Sanjeev Premi wrote:
The current selection of the GPTIMER on was result of
a hardware issue in early versions of the Beagleboards
(Ax and B1 thru B4). [1] [2]
Its been long since the hardware issue has been fixed.
This patch uses GPTIMER 1 for all newer board revisions
Hi Stephen,
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:16 PM, Stephen Boyd sb...@codeaurora.org wrote:
This sounds a lot like SMD (shared memory driver) on MSM. The main
difference I see is that SMD uses the platform bus instead of the virtio
bus and it has its own protocol for channel allocation.
Yeah,
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:16 PM, Stephen Boyd sb...@codeaurora.org wrote:
This sounds a lot like SMD (shared memory driver) on MSM. The main
difference I see is that SMD uses the platform bus instead of the
14 matches
Mail list logo
