On Sun 2011-06-12 16:20:20, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, May 28, 2011, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> > Some platforms wish to implement their PM core suspend code as
> > modules. To do so, these functions need to be exported to modules.
> >
> > Reported-by: Jean Pihet
> > Signed-off-by: Kevin
On Sunday, June 26, 2011, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Sun 2011-06-12 16:20:20, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday, May 28, 2011, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> > > Some platforms wish to implement their PM core suspend code as
> > > modules. To do so, these functions need to be exported to modules.
> >
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 01:06:00PM +0200, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> From: Nayak, Rajendra
>
> Add a clockdomain api to check if hardware supervised
> idle transitions are enabled on a clockdomain.
>
...
> + * clkdm_is_idle - Check if the clkdm hwsup/autoidle is enabled
> + * @clkdm: struct clockdo
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 02:06:32PM +0200, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> Duplicate the existing API for clockdomain enable from clock to enable
> a clock domain from hwmod framework.
> This will be needed when the hwmod framework will move from the current
> clock centric approach to the module based appr
Hi
On Fri, 10 Jun, Steve Sakoman wrote:
> I've used the omap watchdog timer (CONFIG_OMAP_WATCHDOG=y &
> CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y) with good results on 35XX based systems.
>
> Recently I attempted to use the the same technique with 37XX and
> discovered that my systems hangs instead of rebooting.
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Koen Kooi
> Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2011 1:41 AM
> To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org List
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel; Paul Walmsley
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] omap3: beagle: Use GPTIM
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:p...@pwsan.com]
> Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2011 4:17 AM
> To: Koen Kooi; Premi, Sanjeev
> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org List; linux-arm-kernel
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] omap3: beagle: Use GPTIMERi 1 for clockevents
>
> On Sun, 26 Jun 2011, Pr
> -Original Message-
> From: Russell King - ARM Linux [mailto:li...@arm.linux.org.uk]
> Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2011 12:39 AM
> To: Premi, Sanjeev
> Cc: Shilimkar, Santosh; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; Hilman, Kevin
> Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] omap2+: pm
Hi Tomi,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 17:35 +0530, K, Mythri P wrote:
>> Hi Tomi,
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Tomi Valkeinen
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 13:47 +0530, Mythri P K wrote:
>> >> HDMI IP block is common between TI
Hi Rajendra, Todd,
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> Paul/Benoit any thoughts on if a per-clkdm lock seems reasonable?
Sounds okay to me.
The experimental patch that you sent didn't add the locking to the *wkdep,
*sleepdep functions; I guess we'd better add it there at the same time
10 matches
Mail list logo