Re: [PATCHv6 01/11] omap: prcm: switch to a chained IRQ handler mechanism

2011-08-26 Thread Paul Walmsley
Hello Tero, a few comments on this patch: On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, Tero Kristo wrote: > Introduce a chained interrupt handler mechanism for the PRCM > interrupt, so that individual PRCM event can cleanly be handled by > handlers in separate drivers. We do this by introducing PRCM event > names, whic

[patch] dwc3: add a kfree() on error to dwc3_testmode_open()

2011-08-26 Thread Dan Carpenter
We may as well fix this potential leak so we don't have to listen to the static checkers complain. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter --- Btw. This function returns -EBUSY on success. Was that really what you want? diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/debugfs.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/debugfs.c index 432df53..d

Re: [patch] dwc3: add a kfree() on error to dwc3_testmode_open()

2011-08-26 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:21:13PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > We may as well fix this potential leak so we don't have to listen to > the static checkers complain. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter applied, thanks -- balbi signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [patch] dwc3: add a kfree() on error to dwc3_testmode_open()

2011-08-26 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Dan Carpenter | 2011-08-26 12:21:13 [+0300]: >Btw. This function returns -EBUSY on success. Was that really what >you want? At that time yes. The idea was to enable the self-test mode of the core and let it do transfers forth and back and see if it works. There is also no off switch. I wasn't

Re: [patch] dwc3: add a kfree() on error to dwc3_testmode_open()

2011-08-26 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:32:40PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > * Dan Carpenter | 2011-08-26 12:21:13 [+0300]: > > >Btw. This function returns -EBUSY on success. Was that really what > >you want? > > At that time yes. The idea was to enable the self-test mode of the core > and

Re: How to handle named resources with DT?

2011-08-26 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 26 August 2011, David Gibson wrote: > Seriously, how many times do I have to say it? > > > Using _byname in drivers DOES NOT require adding names to the DT. > > > All it needs is some glue logic to attach names as the device tree is > read. This is properly thought of as part of the

Removing platform_get_resource_byname() (was Re: How to handle named resources with DT?)

2011-08-26 Thread Paul Walmsley
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > It's not at all about whether the Linux codein drivers/of supports this > or not, adding it would be trivial. The point is that it would be > *wrong* to add it because there already exists a way to identify every > resource in the device tree and we shou

[PATCH 1/6] omap: musb: Adding hwmod data for ti81xx

2011-08-26 Thread Ajay Kumar Gupta
From: Ravi B The usb subsystem (usbss) in ti81xx has two musb interfaces. There are three irqs and three address spaces for usbss, musb0 and musb1 respectively. Created one hwmod with three irq and memory resources. Cc: Benoit Cousson Cc: Keshava Munegowda Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar Gupta Sign

[PATCH 5/6] ti814evm: Add support for musb interface

2011-08-26 Thread Ajay Kumar Gupta
From: Ravi B Adding musb support in ti814 EVM board file. Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar Gupta Signed-off-by: Ravi B --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-ti8148evm.c | 15 +++ 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-ti8148evm.c b/arch/arm/m

[PATCH 2/6] omap: musb: Adding support for ti816x

2011-08-26 Thread Ajay Kumar Gupta
From: Ravi B Added musb support for ti816x platform which has two instances of musb interface and uses CPPI4.1 DMA. The current patch set adds support for single instance and in PIO mode only. Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar Gupta Signed-off-by: Ravi B --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-musb.c |3 +++

[PATCH 3/6] omap: musb: ti81xx: Add phy power function

2011-08-26 Thread Ajay Kumar Gupta
Adding ti81xx_musb_phy_power() which will be used by musb driver through its function pointer in board_data. Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar Gupta Signed-off-by: Ravi B --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_phy_internal.c | 24 +++ arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/usb.h | 32 +

[PATCH 4/6] ti816evm: Add support for musb interface

2011-08-26 Thread Ajay Kumar Gupta
From: Ravi B Adding musb support in ti816 EVM board file. Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar Gupta Signed-off-by: Ravi B --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-ti8168evm.c | 15 +++ 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-ti8168evm.c b/arch/arm/m

[PATCH 0/6] TI81XX: musb support

2011-08-26 Thread Ajay Kumar Gupta
This patch set adds support for musb interface for TI81XX platforms and are dependent on recent patch series from Hemant Pedanekar at [1] and [2]. TI81XX platform has dual musb instances, uses CPPI4.1 DMA and has built in usb PHY. The current set of patches supports only the first interface and in

[PATCH 6/6] usb: musb: Add support for ti81xx platform

2011-08-26 Thread Ajay Kumar Gupta
From: Ravi B TI81XX platform has two musb interfaces and uses CPPI4.1 DMA engine. It has builtin USB PHYs as AM35x. The current set of patches adds support for one instance and only in PIO mode. Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar Gupta Signed-off-by: Ravi B --- drivers/usb/musb/Kconfig |6 + d

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 6/6 V3] hwmon: OMAP4: On die temperature sensor driver

2011-08-26 Thread J, KEERTHY
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 10:06 -0400, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 06:30:07AM -0400, J, KEERTHY wrote: >> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Guenter Roeck >> > wrote: >> > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:37:12AM -0400, Keerthy

Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] omap: iommu migration, relocation and cleanups

2011-08-26 Thread Roedel, Joerg
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 01:08:07PM -0400, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > Ohad Ben-Cohen (7): > omap: iommu: migrate to the generic IOMMU API > omap: iommu/iovmm: move to dedicated iommu folder > omap: iommu: stop exporting local functions > omap: iommu: PREFETCH_IOTLB cleanup > omap: iovmm: remo

Re: [PATCH 4/6] ti816evm: Add support for musb interface

2011-08-26 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. On 26-08-2011 15:11, Ajay Kumar Gupta wrote: From: Ravi B Adding musb support in ti816 EVM board file. Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar Gupta Signed-off-by: Ravi B As far as I know, full name is required in signoff. --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-ti8168evm.c | 15 ++

Re: [PATCH 5/6] ti814evm: Add support for musb interface

2011-08-26 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. On 26-08-2011 15:11, Ajay Kumar Gupta wrote: From: Ravi B Adding musb support in ti814 EVM board file. Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar Gupta Signed-off-by: Ravi B --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-ti8148evm.c | 15 +++ 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) dif

RE: [PATCH 4/6] ti816evm: Add support for musb interface

2011-08-26 Thread Gupta, Ajay Kumar
Hi, > > On 26-08-2011 15:11, Ajay Kumar Gupta wrote: > > > From: Ravi B > > > Adding musb support in ti816 EVM board file. > > > Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar Gupta > > Signed-off-by: Ravi B > > As far as I know, full name is required in signoff. Ok. > > > --- > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/boa

Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] omap: iommu migration, relocation and cleanups

2011-08-26 Thread Ohad Ben-Cohen
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Roedel, Joerg wrote: > Applied all to arm/omap, thanks Ohad. I also put a commit on-top which > finished the mutex->spin_lock conversion. Looks like one call-place was > missed. See attached patch. > > commit 4234541f1a64d9dc6d489cf8f614dc01c62360f6 > Author: Joerg

Issue: Runtime API usage in wake-up device irq_handler during wakeup from system-wide-suspend.

2011-08-26 Thread Govindraj.R
Hello, During system_wide_suspend pm runtime is disabled. I.e. __pm_runtime_disable is called from __device_suspend. Now, if a wakeup interrupt is triggered and the wakeup device irq handler is called even before device_resume and pm_runtime_enable happens, the device irq_handler proceeds to enabl

Re: [PATCH v5 03/22] gpio/omap: make gpio_context part of gpio_bank structure

2011-08-26 Thread Santosh
On Friday 26 August 2011 01:53 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote: Santosh writes: On Thursday 04 August 2011 04:34 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote: From: Charulatha V Currently gpio_context array used to save gpio bank's context, is used only for OMAP3 architecture. Move gpio_context as part of gpio_ban

Re: How to handle named resources with DT?

2011-08-26 Thread Cousson, Benoit
On 8/26/2011 12:58 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Friday 26 August 2011, David Gibson wrote: Seriously, how many times do I have to say it? [...] Insisting that the names come from the DT is to mistakenly think of the DT as an extension of the kernel's internal interfaces, instead of as the ext

Re: [PATCH v14 REPOST 01/12] OMAP2+: dmtimer: add device names to flck nodes

2011-08-26 Thread Santosh
On Friday 15 July 2011 05:34 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote: Add device name to OMAP2 dmtimer fclk nodes so that the fclk nodes can be retrieved by doing a clk_get with the corresponding device pointers or device names. Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma Acked-by: Cousson, Benoit --- Looks go

Re: [PATCH v14 REPOST 03/12] OMAP1: dmtimer: conversion to platform devices

2011-08-26 Thread Santosh
On Friday 15 July 2011 05:34 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote: From: Thara Gopinath Convert OMAP1 dmtimers into a platform devices and then registers with device model framework so that it can be bound to corresponding driver. Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma Acke

Re: [PATCH v14 REPOST 04/12] OMAP2+: dmtimer: convert to platform devices

2011-08-26 Thread Santosh
On Friday 15 July 2011 05:34 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote: Add routines to converts dmtimers to platform devices. The device data is obtained from hwmod database of respective platform and is registered to device model after successful binding to driver. In addition, capability attribute of eac

Re: [PATCH v14 REPOST 05/12] OMAP: dmtimer: platform driver

2011-08-26 Thread Santosh
On Friday 15 July 2011 05:34 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote: Add dmtimer platform driver functions which include: (1) platform driver initialization (2) driver probe function (3) driver remove function Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath Acked-by: Cousson, Benoit --

Re: [PATCH v14 REPOST 06/12] OMAP: dmtimer: switch-over to platform device driver

2011-08-26 Thread Santosh
On Friday 15 July 2011 05:34 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote: Register timer devices by going through hwmod database using hwmod API. The driver probes each of the registered devices. Functionality which are already performed by hwmod framework are removed from timer code. New set of timers presen

Re: [PATCH v14 REPOST 02/12] OMAP4: hwmod data: add dmtimer version information

2011-08-26 Thread Santosh
On Friday 15 July 2011 05:34 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote: OMAP4 has two groups of timers: version 1 timers are 1, 2, 10, while the rest of the timers, 3-9, 11 are version 2 timers. The version information is required by the driver so that they could be handled correctly by it. Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH v14 REPOST 07/12] OMAP: dmtimer: pm_runtime support

2011-08-26 Thread Santosh
On Friday 15 July 2011 05:34 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote: Add pm_runtime feature to dmtimer whereby _get_sync() is called within omap_dm_timer_enable(), _put_sync() is called in omap_dm_timer_disable(). Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma [p-bas...@ti.com: added pm_runtime logic in probe()] S

Re: [PATCH v14 REPOST 08/12] OMAP: dmtimer: add timeout to low-level routines

2011-08-26 Thread Santosh
On Friday 15 July 2011 05:34 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote: The low-level read and write access routines wait on write-pending register in posted mode to make sure that previous write is complete on respective registers. This waiting is done in an infinite while loop. Now it is being modified to

Re: How to handle named resources with DT?

2011-08-26 Thread David Gibson
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:58:32PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 26 August 2011, David Gibson wrote: > > Seriously, how many times do I have to say it? > > > > > > Using _byname in drivers DOES NOT require adding names to the DT. > > > > > > All it needs is some glue logic to attach n

Re: [PATCH v14 REPOST 09/12] OMAP: dmtimer: use mutex instead of spinlock

2011-08-26 Thread Santosh
On Friday 15 July 2011 05:34 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote: Since the spinlock is not used in any interrupt context we can replace it with mutex instead. Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma --- Patch looks good but change log doesn't reflect it. Do you want to say that below API's are not used

Re: How to handle named resources with DT?

2011-08-26 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 26 August 2011, David Gibson wrote: > If you open code it this way then yes, it's silly. But what about > something like this: > > static struct of_device_id foodevice_of_match[] __devinitdata = { > { .compatible = "foocorp,foodevice1234", > .resource_names = {"base_re

Re: How to handle named resources with DT?

2011-08-26 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 26 August 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 26 August 2011, David Gibson wrote: > > If you open code it this way then yes, it's silly. But what about > > something like this: > > > > static struct of_device_id foodevice_of_match[] __devinitdata = { > > { .compatible = "fooc

Re: [PATCH v14 REPOST 10/12] OMAP: dmtimer: mark clocksource and clockevent timers reserved

2011-08-26 Thread Santosh
On Friday 15 July 2011 05:34 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote: In driver probe use sys_timer_reserved to identify which all timers have already been used for clocksource and clockevent. Mark all those timers as reserved so that no one else can use them. Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma --- Loo

Re: [PATCH v14 REPOST 11/12] OMAP: dmtimer: add context save/restore routines

2011-08-26 Thread Santosh
On Friday 15 July 2011 05:35 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote: Define context register structure and make it member of struct omap_dm_timer. Also define two routines to save and restore dmtimer context to be used subsequently. Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma --- arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c

[PATCH v5] usb: musb: Enable DMA mode1 RX for BULK endpoints

2011-08-26 Thread Moiz Sonasath
From: Anand Gadiyar This patch enables the DMA mode1 RX support for endpoints that use BULK transactions. This will result in a throughput increase of around 30-40% for BULK transfers (mass-storage/mtp/ptp usecases) Tested: Mass-storage, MTP, PTP, ADB, RNDIS gadgets Signed-off-by: Anand Gadiyar

Re: [PATCH v14 REPOST 12/12] OMAP: dmtimer: Off mode support

2011-08-26 Thread Santosh
On Friday 15 July 2011 05:35 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote: Clock is enabled only when timer is started and disabled when the the timer is stopped. Therefore before accessing registers in functions clock is enabled and then disabled back at the end of access. Context save and restore functions a

Re: [PATCH v14 REPOST 09/12] OMAP: dmtimer: use mutex instead of spinlock

2011-08-26 Thread Santosh
On Friday 26 August 2011 09:04 PM, Santosh wrote: On Friday 15 July 2011 05:34 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote: Since the spinlock is not used in any interrupt context we can replace it with mutex instead. Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma --- Patch looks good but change log doesn't reflect i

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 6/6 V3] hwmon: OMAP4: On die temperature sensor driver

2011-08-26 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 07:17 -0400, J, KEERTHY wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Guenter Roeck > wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 10:06 -0400, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 06:30:07AM -0400, J, KEERTHY wrote: > >> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Guenter Roeck > >> >

[PATCH] omap_vout: fix section mismatch in probe function

2011-08-26 Thread Chase Maupin
Building the OMAP vout driver resulted in the following message: WARNING: vmlinux.o(.data+0x38084): Section mismatch in reference from the variable omap_vout_driver to the function .init.text:omap_vout_probe() The variable omap_vout_driver references the funct

Re: [PATCH v9 00/12] use nonblock mmc requests to minimize latency

2011-08-26 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
I'm not sure who's responsible for this, but the nonblocking MMC stuff is broken on OMAPs HSMMC: mmcblk0: error -84 transferring data, sector 149201, nr 64, cmd response 0x900, card status 0xb00 mmcblk0: retrying using single block re

Re: [PATCH v14 REPOST 07/12] OMAP: dmtimer: pm_runtime support

2011-08-26 Thread Kevin Hilman
Santosh writes: > On Friday 15 July 2011 05:34 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote: >> Add pm_runtime feature to dmtimer whereby _get_sync() is called within >> omap_dm_timer_enable(), _put_sync() is called in omap_dm_timer_disable(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma >> [p-bas...@ti.com: adde

Re: [PATCH v9 00/12] use nonblock mmc requests to minimize latency

2011-08-26 Thread Santosh
+ Balaji, On Friday 26 August 2011 09:49 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: I'm not sure who's responsible for this, but the nonblocking MMC stuff is broken on OMAPs HSMMC: mmcblk0: error -84 transferring data, sector 149201, nr 64, cmd response 0x900, card status 0xb00 mmcblk0: retrying usin

Re: [PATCH v14 REPOST 07/12] OMAP: dmtimer: pm_runtime support

2011-08-26 Thread Santosh
On Friday 26 August 2011 09:53 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: Santosh writes: On Friday 15 July 2011 05:34 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote: Add pm_runtime feature to dmtimer whereby _get_sync() is called within omap_dm_timer_enable(), _put_sync() is called in omap_dm_timer_disable(). Signed-off-by:

Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 02/11] PM: extend PM QoS with per-device wake-up constraints

2011-08-26 Thread mark gross
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 04:17:31PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, August 25, 2011, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:31:54PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > Perhaps. Still, that requires some policy to be put into drivers, > > > which I don't think is enti

Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 02/11] PM: extend PM QoS with per-device wake-up constraints

2011-08-26 Thread mark gross
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:25:13AM +0900, MyungJoo Ham wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 12:11 AM, wrote: > > @@ -129,19 +146,19 @@ static const struct file_operations pm_qos_power_fops > > = { > >  /* unlocked internal variant */ > >  static inline int pm_qos_get_value(struct pm_qos_object *o) >

RE: Question on virtual memory layout: lowmem with memory hole

2011-08-26 Thread Pedanekar, Hemant
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote on Friday, August 26, 2011 12:22 AM: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:06:20AM +0530, Pedanekar, Hemant wrote: >> Russell King - ARM Linux wrote on Thursday, August 25, 2011 3:53 PM: >> >>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 09:35:07AM +0530, Pedanekar, Hemant wrote: E.g., on

Re: [linux-pm] Issue: Runtime API usage in wake-up device irq_handler during wakeup from system-wide-suspend.

2011-08-26 Thread Alan Stern
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011, Govindraj.R wrote: > Hello, > > During system_wide_suspend pm runtime is disabled. > I.e. __pm_runtime_disable is called from __device_suspend. > Now, if a wakeup interrupt is triggered and the wakeup device irq handler > is called even before device_resume and pm_runtime_ena

RE: 3.1-rc3 fails to boot on my pandaboard

2011-08-26 Thread Maupin, Chase
> -Original Message- > From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- > ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Govindraj > Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 6:46 AM > To: Coelho, Luciano > Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Thomas > Gleixner; Sebastian And

Re: Issue: Runtime API usage in wake-up device irq_handler during wakeup from system-wide-suspend.

2011-08-26 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, August 26, 2011, Govindraj.R wrote: > Hello, > > During system_wide_suspend pm runtime is disabled. > I.e. __pm_runtime_disable is called from __device_suspend. > Now, if a wakeup interrupt is triggered and the wakeup device irq handler > is called even before device_resume and pm_runti

Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 02/11] PM: extend PM QoS with per-device wake-up constraints

2011-08-26 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, August 26, 2011, mark gross wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:25:13AM +0900, MyungJoo Ham wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 12:11 AM, wrote: > > > @@ -129,19 +146,19 @@ static const struct file_operations > > > pm_qos_power_fops = { > > > /* unlocked internal variant */ > > > stat

Re: [PATCHv6 1/3] OMAP: I2C: Reset support

2011-08-26 Thread Kevin Hilman
Shubhrajyoti D writes: > Under some error conditions the i2c driver may do a reset. > Adding a reset field and support in the device-specific code. > > Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D Needs update/rebase to apply against my for_3.2/i2c-cleanup branch... [...] > diff --git a/include/linux/i2c-om

Re: [PATCHv6 2/3] OMAP: I2C: Remove the reset in the init path

2011-08-26 Thread Kevin Hilman
Shubhrajyoti D writes: > - The reset in the driver at init is not needed anymore as the >hwmod framework takes care of reseting it. > - Reset is removed from omap_i2c_init, which was called >not only during probe, but also after time out and error handling. >device_reset were added

Re: [PATCH v2] OMAP2: PM debug: remove leftover debug code

2011-08-26 Thread Kevin Hilman
Michael Jones writes: > commit 20d5d5514981f9a68832bffb27a698545ecba77a (OMAP2: PM debug: > remove register dumping) left some code lying around which doesn't > do anything. Clean it up. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Jones Thanks, queueing for v3.2 (branch: for_3.2/pm-cleanup) Kevin P.S., apolog

Re: [RFC 1/2] OMAP3+: voltage / oscillator parameter segregation

2011-08-26 Thread Kevin Hilman
Hi Nishanth, "Menon, Nishanth" writes: > here is my quick feedback: > > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:29, Tero Kristo wrote: >> >> This patch separates board specific voltage and oscillator ramp / setup >> times from the core code. Things changed: >> >> - on/sleep/ret/off voltage setup moved from

Re: [PATCH 6/6] usb: musb: Add support for ti81xx platform

2011-08-26 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 04:41:48PM +0530, Ajay Kumar Gupta wrote: > @@ -57,6 +58,10 @@ config USB_MUSB_AM35X > tristate "AM35x" > depends on ARCH_OMAP > > +config USB_MUSB_TI81XX > + bool "TI81XX" > + depends on SOC_OMAPTI81XX this *must* be tristate. I can't emphasize e

Re: [linux-pm] Issue: Runtime API usage in wake-up device irq_handler during wakeup from system-wide-suspend.

2011-08-26 Thread Santosh
Alen, On Saturday 27 August 2011 12:06 AM, Alan Stern wrote: On Fri, 26 Aug 2011, Govindraj.R wrote: Hello, During system_wide_suspend pm runtime is disabled. I.e. __pm_runtime_disable is called from __device_suspend. Now, if a wakeup interrupt is triggered and the wakeup device irq handler i