Re: OMAP totally fucked?

2012-03-03 Thread Tony Lindgren
Hi Arnd & Olof, * Tony Lindgren [120303 12:49]: > > Anyways, we should revert commit 72b026a4 because of the > breakage it causes. Correction, we should revert commit c295fb63. The above commit is wrong and only exists on my machine. Arnd & Olof, can you please revert commit c295fb63 (ARM: OMA

Re: OMAP totally fucked?

2012-03-03 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Russell King - ARM Linux [120303 12:20]: > On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 12:34:48PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Tony Lindgren [120303 11:56]: > > > * Tony Lindgren [120303 11:29]: > > > > * Russell King - ARM Linux [120303 10:57]: > > > > > > > > > > Even with the full config, making oldconf

Re: OMAP totally fucked?

2012-03-03 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Arnd Bergmann [120303 09:57]: > On Saturday 03 March 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Well 85631d2 builds fine, looks like now some more includes of > > plat/hardware.h are now needed.Have not yet tracked down which > > commit triggers the build errors. Eventually those should become > > local hea

Re: OMAP totally fucked?

2012-03-03 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 12:34:48PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Tony Lindgren [120303 11:56]: > > * Tony Lindgren [120303 11:29]: > > > * Russell King - ARM Linux [120303 10:57]: > > > > > > > > Even with the full config, making oldconfig I get: > > > > > > > > OMAP2420 support (SOC_OMAP242

Re: OMAP totally fucked?

2012-03-03 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Tony Lindgren [120303 11:56]: > * Tony Lindgren [120303 11:29]: > > * Russell King - ARM Linux [120303 10:57]: > > > > > > Even with the full config, making oldconfig I get: > > > > > > OMAP2420 support (SOC_OMAP2420) [Y/n] (NEW) > > > OMAP2430 support (SOC_OMAP2430) [Y/n] (NEW) > > > OMAP

Re: OMAP totally fucked?

2012-03-03 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Tony Lindgren [120303 11:29]: > * Russell King - ARM Linux [120303 10:57]: > > > > Even with the full config, making oldconfig I get: > > > > OMAP2420 support (SOC_OMAP2420) [Y/n] (NEW) > > OMAP2430 support (SOC_OMAP2430) [Y/n] (NEW) > > OMAP3430 support (SOC_OMAP3430) [Y/n] (NEW) > > TI81

[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: call all suspend, resume callbacks when OMAP_DEVICE_NO_IDLE_ON_SUSPEND is set

2012-03-03 Thread Paul Walmsley
During system suspend, when OMAP_DEVICE_NO_IDLE_ON_SUSPEND is set on an omap_device, call the corresponding driver's ->suspend() and ->suspend_noirq() callbacks (if present). Similarly, during resume, the driver's ->resume() and ->resume_noirq() callbacks must both be called, if present. (The pr

Re: OMAP totally fucked?

2012-03-03 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Russell King - ARM Linux [120303 10:57]: > On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 11:01:40AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Russell King - ARM Linux [120303 10:00]: > > > On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 10:04:29AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > Well 85631d2 builds fine, looks like now some more includes of >

Re: OMAP totally fucked?

2012-03-03 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 11:01:40AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Russell King - ARM Linux [120303 10:00]: > > On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 10:04:29AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > Well 85631d2 builds fine, looks like now some more includes of > > > plat/hardware.h are now needed.Have not yet trac

Re: OMAP totally fucked?

2012-03-03 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Russell King - ARM Linux [120303 10:00]: > On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 10:04:29AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Well 85631d2 builds fine, looks like now some more includes of > > plat/hardware.h are now needed.Have not yet tracked down which > > commit triggers the build errors. Eventually those s

Re: OMAP totally fucked?

2012-03-03 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 10:04:29AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > Well 85631d2 builds fine, looks like now some more includes of > plat/hardware.h are now needed.Have not yet tracked down which > commit triggers the build errors. Eventually those should become > local headers too.. It looks like th

Re: OMAP totally fucked?

2012-03-03 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Saturday 03 March 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote: > Well 85631d2 builds fine, looks like now some more includes of > plat/hardware.h are now needed.Have not yet tracked down which > commit triggers the build errors. Eventually those should become > local headers too.. I've tried building arm-soc/for

Re: OMAP totally fucked?

2012-03-03 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Russell King - ARM Linux [120303 07:15]: > There's not much more to say other than that in the subject over this > level of build breakage: > > http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/build/result.php?type=build&idx=267 > http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/build/result.php?type=build&idx=268 >

OMAP totally fucked?

2012-03-03 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
There's not much more to say other than that in the subject over this level of build breakage: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/build/result.php?type=build&idx=267 http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/build/result.php?type=build&idx=268 which is the result of building: commit 812108a6044b7

Re: [PATCH 11/12] mfd: twl4030-irq: Return twl6030_mmc_card_detect IRQ for board setup

2012-03-03 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. On 02-03-2012 20:50, Benoit Cousson wrote: Card detect IRQ from the TWL6030 used to be provided to the MMC controller code using a statically allocated IRQ scheme: card_detect_irq = TWL6030_IRQ_BASE + MMCDETECT_INTR_OFFSET; This is no longer valid in a SPARSE_IRQ context since th