Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] mmc: omap_hsmmc: Clean up use/abuse of pdev->id

2012-03-04 Thread Rajendra Nayak
On Friday 24 February 2012 03:40 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote: Chris, On Thursday 23 February 2012 04:56 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote: Re-sending as these patches did not make it to the lists due to issues with my 'git send-email' This series mainly cleans up all instances of hardcoding's in the drive

Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] MFD: twl6040: Convert to i2c driver, and separate it from twl core

2012-03-04 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:34:52AM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > Complete the separation of the twl6040 from the twl core since > it is a separate chip, not part of the twl6030 PMIC. > > Make the needed Kconfig changes for the depending drivers at the same time to > avoid breaking the kernel buil

Re: OMAP totally fucked?

2012-03-04 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 01:05:21PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Arnd Bergmann [120303 09:57]: > > On Saturday 03 March 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > Well 85631d2 builds fine, looks like now some more includes of > > > plat/hardware.h are now needed.Have not yet tracked down which > > > commi

[PATCH] ARM: OMAP: don't build hwspinlock in vain

2012-03-04 Thread Ohad Ben-Cohen
Cleanup: don't build mach-omap2/hwspinlock.c if the OMAP hwspinlock driver isn't configured. This will both shorten build time and avoid registering a device which isn't needed. Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen --- Tony, it's probably better if you take it, to minimize omap merge conflicts. Thanks!

[PATCH] ARM: OMAP: fix iommu, not mailbox

2012-03-04 Thread Ohad Ben-Cohen
For some weird (freudian?) reason, commit 435792d "ARM: OMAP: make iommu subsys_initcall to fix builtin omap3isp" unintentionally changed the mailbox's initcall instead of the iommu's. Fix that. Reported-by: Fernando Guzman Lugo Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen Cc: Laurent Pinchart Cc: Joerg Roed

Re: Ethernet problems on AM3517, possible regression?

2012-03-04 Thread Igor Grinberg
Hi, On 03/02/12 01:16, CF Adad wrote: > We have both a CompuLab CM-T3517 and a Technexion TAM-3517 at the shop. Both > boards provide dual Ethernet support in an identical fashion. One port uses > the onboard EMAC tied to an SMSC LAN87xx series PHY. The other is the old > trusty SMSC LAN911X