On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Mark Jackson mpfj-l...@mimc.co.uk wrote:
Before I dig any deeper, can anyone tell me if the bootarg mpurate is meant
to
be supported for AM335x SoCs ?
I've tried it on our custom board using 3v8, but no joy.
The boot log shows:-
[0.00] Booting
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:48:19AM +0100, Paolo Pisati wrote:
any idea how can i debug this?
Please try this patch, and report back whether it solves your problem.
Thanks.
arch/arm/mm/alignment.c | 11 ---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git
On 02/22/2013 02:03 AM, Jason Kridner wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Mark Jackson mpfj-l...@mimc.co.uk wrote:
Before I dig any deeper, can anyone tell me if the bootarg mpurate is meant to
be supported for AM335x SoCs ?
I've tried it on our custom board using 3v8, but no joy.
The
Our use case is partial reconfiguration of the FPGA. This will be
driven from userspace, so the bitstream to program the FPGA will come
from userspace, then the overlay for the DT, also from userspace.
So we want to take a compiled partial device tree and simply 'cat' it
to a point under /proc,
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:37:10PM -0600, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
Any comments on this approach? Is it better to merge mkfitsrc.sh with
mkuboot.sh?
I know this was discussed quite extensively yesterday, but here is my take on
it:
Given the recent complications from multiplatform, we really saw
On 2/21/2013 11:36 AM, Mark Jackson wrote:
Before I dig any deeper, can anyone tell me if the bootarg mpurate is meant to
be supported for AM335x SoCs ?
I've tried it on our custom board using 3v8, but no joy.
The boot log shows:-
[0.00] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0
[
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 02:56:33AM -0500, Jason Kridner wrote:
The desired FPGA use case is DT updates after booting the kernel. This
has nothing to do with FIT images. And if the FPGA tools generate the
DTB, then it is certainly not tied to the kernel.
Completely unrelated, but do you
On 02/21/2013 05:39 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 05:10:36PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 02/21/2013 02:18 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
...
Someone will want to use a previously unsupported feature of some HW and
then write the DT bindings for that feature for the
