On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 11:17 +0200, Tero Kristo wrote:
>
> On 12/22/2013 07:52 PM, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> >[ dropped devicetree, we're clock specific here ]
> >
> >On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 18:34 +0200, Tero Kristo wrote:
> >>
> >>Divider clock
the clock item, or is "global" for a
platform, yet can get re-registered at runtime (see the comment
on 06/49)? And why are you referencing clk_readl() instead of
clk_readl_default() which you specifically have introduced in the
previous patch? Adding a copy of the routine and using
but does not remove the then obsolete
static inlines from the header.
Tero, can you please verify whether the clk_readl() and
clk_writel() routines from become
obsolete with your patch, or whether any unchanged users remain?
Are other parts of v12 still stuck? I only saw 15 of 49 patches.
virtuall
hile patches are pending (currently
under review and receiving further improvement) which introduce
several alternative implementations of clk_readl() depending on
the platform. Making all of them duplicate the "regmap vs direct
register access" branch would be as bad. Keeping one set of
clk_r
