Re: [PATCH][RFC] OMAP4: I2C Support for OMAP_4430SDP

2009-06-04 Thread Jagadeesh Bhaskar Pakaravoor
why is this 2600? omap3 could do 3.3Mhz. There is a silicon issue reported on TWL5030 which says that it can not operate at the stipulated highest frequency of 3.3MHz. The information I got is this: I2C data hold time in HS mode is higher than specification when reading I2C registers. This

Re: [PATCH] I2C:Moving Register Defines to Header File

2009-05-14 Thread Jagadeesh Bhaskar Pakaravoor
IMO, The regs do not need to move to a separate header unless they will be used outside of i2c-omap.c. Would it not be cleaner to move them to a separate header file, especially considering the fact that we have some 19 registers for OMAP3 I2C and when we redefine them for OMAP4, there would be

Re: [PATCH] I2C: OMAP: Add missing wakeup events

2009-05-04 Thread Jagadeesh Bhaskar Pakaravoor
assuming that Ben has picked up this for his queue, so not adding it to any of my ustream queues. Acked-by: Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com Regards, Tony Is this patch applied? -- With Regards, Jagadeesh Bhaskar Pakaravoor -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap

[PATCH] twl4030-usb: rename twl4030_driver to twl4030_usb_driver.

2008-10-14 Thread Jagadeesh Bhaskar Pakaravoor
The i2c_driver in twl4030-core.c and platform_driver of twl4030-usb.c both has the name twl4030_driver. This leads to unnecessary confusion. So rename the usb platform_driver appropriately to: twl4030_usb_driver. Signed-off-by: Jagadeesh Bhaskar Pakaravoor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: linux-omap-git