0 or NULL,
> where some of the fields already use labels, and where there are nested
> structures.
I responded to patches 6 and 8 with comments; for the rest (1-5, 7, 9):
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the bo
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 08:55:02AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 09:03:51PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 02:23:26PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 01:57:15PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > > On T
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 02:23:26PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 01:57:15PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 11:49:28PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:33:07AM +0500, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
> >
ould make more sense than this "try again later" mechanism, but
nonetheless "try again later" seems like an improvement over what we
have now.)
> It also cleans up this diff a lot, as you really don't want #ifdef in .c
> files.
Ideally the entire .c file could become
