Re: [PATCH v4 00/25] dmaengine/ARM: Merge the edma drivers into one

2015-10-06 Thread Koul, Vinod
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 09:15 +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > Hi > > On 09/24/2015 01:01 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Changes since v3: > > - Separated the two (patch 10/11 in v2 patch 10 in v3) patch which got > > squashed > > by accident for v3 > > - Added Tony's Acked-by to patch

Re: [PATCH] DMAEngine: Define generic transfer request api

2011-08-19 Thread Koul, Vinod
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 15:06 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Koul, Vinod vinod.k...@intel.com wrote: Currently we have two approaches to solve this problem first being the DMA_STRIDE_CONFIG proposed by Linus W, I feel this one is better approach as this can

Re: [PATCH] DMAEngine: Define generic transfer request api

2011-08-16 Thread Koul, Vinod
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 16:44 +0530, Jassi Brar wrote: Define a new api that could be used for doing fancy data transfers like interleaved to contiguous copy and vice-versa. Traditional SG_list based transfers tend to be very inefficient in such cases as where the interleave and chunk are only a

RE: [RFC] dmaengine: add new api for preparing simple slave transfer

2011-06-16 Thread Koul, Vinod
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 12:12 +0530, Raju, Sundaram wrote: snip The overall conclusion which I'm coming to is that we already support what you're asking for, but the problem is that we're using different (and I'd argue standard) terminology to describe what we have. The only issue

RE: [RFC] dmaengine: add new api for preparing simple slave transfer

2011-06-10 Thread Koul, Vinod
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 21:31 +0530, Raju, Sundaram wrote: Here it is, with proper line wrapping; Please cc the respective MAINTAINERS, added Dan... SDMA and EDMA are TI SoC specific DMA controllers. Their drivers have been maintained in the respective SoC folders till now.

Re: [RFC] dmaengine: add new api for preparing simple slave transfer

2011-06-10 Thread Koul, Vinod
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 17:32 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 09:31:56PM +0530, Raju, Sundaram wrote: Here it is, with proper line wrapping; Thanks. This is much easier to reply to. I believe that even though the dmaengine framework addresses and supports

RE: [RFC] dmaengine: add new api for preparing simple slave transfer

2011-06-10 Thread Koul, Vinod
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 16:43 +0530, Raju, Sundaram wrote: Vinod, ... Now coming to the buffer related attributes, sg list is a nice way to represent a disjoint buffer; all the offload engines in drivers/dma create a descriptor for each of the contiguous chunk in the sg list buffer